Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,833,234 times
Reputation: 6438
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by highcotton
I'm not sure why you could possibly think it is the original with ALL the evidence that it is a 'built' (assembled) forgery. Obviously however, you do seem to have doubts. Yes, I'd like to see the document be carbon dated too. It looks nothing like the twin girls' long-form birth certifcate that were born one day after Obama's birth date. Wonder why that is?
Clearly Obama and his administration is taking the American people as fools. If one does not question this - a fool they are...
Carbon dating...the birth certificate.
BWAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA
Then again, that would be kind of awesome. If people accepted the Carbon dating thing, they'd have to agree that the earth is billions of years old...because that's what carbon 14 dating is based off of.
The Carbon Dating Theory assumes that the Earth is billions of years old, which is a direct contradiction of the Biblical account, as described below.
According to Jesus Christ, this Universe is only approximately 6,000 years old
Could this be some sort of conspiracy to make people believe in evolution vs. Jesus? Sounds like Obama mischief, to me. I bet he planned it this way, just like the tornados that hit. He planned that, too. With his evil weather machine.
Howard Stern had something like 6,000,000 listeners at the time of certain complaints to the FCC (censorship / decency issues. The complaints numbered something like 150,000 so approximately 2.5% of the listeners, a clear minority. Here, the poll says 125 out of 145 polled, 86% have "moved on." There sure is a lot of noise being made from the minority. Amazing!
After looking at all the posts - i still think its original but to finally put this issue to bed
it would be interesting to carbon date the document.
that would be interesting
I assume you looked at the video analyses and I am curious as to why you think it is original. I am sincerely trying to determine the truth here, so I am interested in how people form their conclusions based on the available information. Thanks to anyone who answers this!
I assume you looked at the video analyses and I am curious as to why you think it is original. I am sincerely trying to determine the truth here, so I am interested in how people form their conclusions based on the available information. Thanks to anyone who answers this!
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,833,234 times
Reputation: 6438
I've had a background check for a top secret clearance. Obama is cleared for everything.
If he wasn't legit, he wouldn't be where he is.
When he was a Senator, no one cared about his birth certificate. It was good enough then, but not when he became President. That doesn't sound fishy to birthers; that sounds reasonable. To me, it sounds retarded.
I've had a background check for a top secret clearance. Obama is cleared for everything.
If he wasn't legit, he wouldn't be where he is.
When he was a Senator, no one cared about his birth certificate. It was good enough then, but not when he became President. That doesn't sound fishy to birthers; that sounds reasonable. To me, it sounds retarded.
It's all smoke and mirrors.
But can you look at the video analyses and explain how the apparent anomalies are "normal" when a document has been directly scanned or photocopied? And do you have any opinion on why the document would be so layered and piecemeal in the first place? Or why the pixels in the characters from the same signature word ('Dunham' for example) would be of different sizes?
Is anyone here a non-partisan graphics expert who can post objectively about this? Thanks.
Then again, that would be kind of awesome. If people accepted the Carbon dating thing, they'd have to agree that the earth is billions of years old...because that's what carbon 14 dating is based off of.
The Carbon Dating Theory assumes that the Earth is billions of years old, which is a direct contradiction of the Biblical account, as described below.
According to Jesus Christ, this Universe is only approximately 6,000 years old
Could this be some sort of conspiracy to make people believe in evolution vs. Jesus? Sounds like Obama mischief, to me. I bet he planned it this way, just like the tornados that hit. He planned that, too. With his evil weather machine.
You didn't know that the Commander In Chief has access to HAARP, the so-called death ray that is stashed in the North Pole? You can point it at a certain Geographic area and control the thoughts / mood of a large group of people...and the weather. He has also upped the frequency of vapor trails, seeding the clouds with a mix of mind altering chemicals.
So go ahead. Have your microwaved, genetically modified, processed food and turn on the "news". It's all part of the plan. BTW, the tin foil hat will not ward off the death ray.
Have a nice day and rest assured...you are being watched...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As usual...lot's of noise from the minority...
