|
05-13-2011, 08:59 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 7,814,576 times
Reputation: 2970
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4
|
Texas IS receiving aid with the wildfire problems. Perry and other Republican's are attempting to portray the denial of a wide ranging request for 252 of 254 counties as the end of the request.
Don't think so. It's another attempt by Perry to say....don't pay attention to the man behind the curtain. Accepting money, while bashing the request that they knew would be denied.
FEMA contradicts Perry on firefighting aid - San Antonio Express-News
Quote:
It is an impression contradicted by officials at the Federal Emergency Management Agency, who awarded Texas its 26th grant Sunday to help cover the cost of firefighting efforts.
“This administration, through FEMA, has been working closely with the state throughout the duration of these fires, and we are supporting the firefighting efforts,” FEMA spokeswoman Rachel Racusen said.
Those 26 grants will reimburse 75 percent of the costs related to fighting designated fires throughout the state — the same reimbursement rate the state would have received if Perry's request for major disaster status had been accepted.
...
Granting a major disaster declaration allows the federal government to help pay for the costs of reconstruction and direct aid to victims of the fires. Perry requested only Category B funding, which provides reimbursement for the same activities as the fire management grants the state currently is receiving.
|
More hyperbole from Perry and Republicans. |
|
05-13-2011, 01:17 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,894 posts, read 17,879,894 times
Reputation: 6463
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed
There goes any chance the Democrats had of picking up Kay-Baby's seat in 2012
|
Are you kidding me, we are talking about sheeple here, they are a different story, don't you know. |
|
05-13-2011, 01:19 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Tampa Florida
22,232 posts, read 17,293,522 times
Reputation: 4585
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4
|
Err, why send help to Tex, didn't they secede? |
|
05-13-2011, 01:27 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 81,742,587 times
Reputation: 27707
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txgolfer130
Texas IS receiving aid with the wildfire problems. Perry and other Republican's are attempting to portray the denial of a wide ranging request for 252 of 254 counties as the end of the request.
Don't think so. It's another attempt by Perry to say....don't pay attention to the man behind the curtain. Accepting money, while bashing the request that they knew would be denied.
FEMA contradicts Perry on firefighting aid - San Antonio Express-News
More hyperbole from Perry and Republicans. |
Again..it's not the money. A declaration would allow low cost loans to be granted to those that lost everything.
A "Disaster Declaration" opens doors. It's NOT about the money. |
|
05-13-2011, 01:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 81,742,587 times
Reputation: 27707
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob
Err, why send help to Tex, didn't they secede?
|
No but I guess DC must have thought that Mexico was a state and sent the help there.
Is Mexico one of the 57 states maybe ? |
|
05-13-2011, 01:34 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,327,616 times
Reputation: 1754
|
|
|
rick perry hates Obama but he still sent help. Texas gave us bush and perry. Hope you are proud.
|
|
05-13-2011, 01:51 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 81,742,587 times
Reputation: 27707
|
|
NJ asked for a declaration and got denied.
Mississippi has asked for a declaration..has not heard back.
Missouri asked for declaration and got approved.
This is what a declaration allows for..while specific for Missouri you can see it's not just a handout to the state government.
President Obama Signs Missouri Disaster Declaration | The White House
Assistance can include grants for temporary housing and home repairs, low-cost loans to cover uninsured property losses, and other programs to help individuals and business owners recover from the effects of the disaster.
Federal funding also is available to State and eligible local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations on a cost-sharing basis for emergency work and the repair or replacement of facilities damaged by the severe storms, tornadoes, and flooding in St. Louis County.
Federal funding is also available on a cost-sharing basis for hazard mitigation measures statewide. |
|
05-13-2011, 02:05 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 7,814,576 times
Reputation: 2970
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan
Again..it's not the money. A declaration would allow low cost loans to be granted to those that lost everything.
A "Disaster Declaration" opens doors. It's NOT about the money.
|
The problem w/ that is...that Perry DID NOT ask for that. HE ASKED for part B..which is exactly what he got.
Quote:
Assistance for the State and Affected Local Governments Can Include as Required:
- Payment of not less than 75 percent of the eligible costs for removing debris from public areas. (Source: FEMA funded, state administered.)
- Payment of not more than 75 percent of the approved costs for hazard mitigation projects undertaken by state and local governments to prevent or reduce long-term risk to life and property from natural or technological disasters. (Source: FEMA funded, state administered.)
|
As shown here and above:
Quote:
|
Granting a major disaster declaration allows the federal government to help pay for the costs of reconstruction and direct aid to victims of the fires. Perry requested only Category B funding, which provides reimbursement for the same activities as the fire management grants the state currently is receiving.
|
Here is Perry's request:
http://governor.state.tx.us/files/pr...ck20110416.pdf
And how much is Perry asking for? Oh, not much...
Just $70,000,000.00
Last edited by txgolfer130; 05-13-2011 at 02:16 PM..
Reason: Addn'l information
|
|
05-13-2011, 02:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 81,742,587 times
Reputation: 27707
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txgolfer130
The problem w/ that is...that Perry DID NOT ask for that. HE ASKED for part B..which is exactly what he got.
As shown here and above:
Here is Perry's request:
http://governor.state.tx.us/files/pr...ck20110416.pdf
And how much is Perry asking for? Oh, not much...
Just $70,000,000.00 |
He did request just the declaration for the entire state.
Then a few pages in he requests part B for specific states.
Now I don't understand what "approved FMAGs" mean but those counties exceeded it.
So why didn't the WH deny part B but declare for the state ?
Realize that cattlemen are dumping what remaining cattle they have into the market.
Between the drought and fires there's no hay, no water, barns/fences/equipment are gone and there's no money for loans.
This will effect supermarket prices a few months down the road. |
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
