Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Dr. King worked hard to manipulate America into being a country that would openly elect a black man president (which is a good thing), but what about Obama's actions...
Would Dr. King approve of THREE non-defensive wars?
Would he applaud the shooting of an unarmed man in the head and chest?
Would he approve the rapid expansion of the Homeland "Security" Apparatus that seeks to protect the State from its citizens?
Dr. King was more than "put a black man in the Oval Office". He was a true believer in "Peace and Non-Violence".
Even conservatives hold Dr. King as a hero.
...and I don't think Dr. Martin Luther King would like what he sees @ 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Truth be told, I think Dr. King would support Dr. Ron Paul.
Dr. King worked hard to manipulate America into being a country that would openly elect a black man president (which is a good thing), but what about Obama's actions...
Would Dr. King approve of THREE non-defensive wars?
Would he applaud the shooting of an unarmed man in the head and chest?
Would he approve the rapid expansion of the Homeland "Security" Apparatus that seeks to protect the State from its citizens?
Dr. King was more than "put a black man in the Oval Office". He was a true believer in "Peace and Non-Violence".
Even conservatives hold Dr. King as a hero.
...and I don't think Dr. Martin Luther King would like what he sees @ 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Truth be told, I think Dr. King would support Dr. Ron Paul.
Are you really dragging a dead guy into this to bash Obama? LOL you're pathetic
First, this "dead guy" happens to be a National Treasure.
Second, how come a critical discussion of Obama's policies is called "bashing" but a critical discussion of Bush's policies is called "telling the truth about Bush and his Cabal"?
The principles of non-violence that King gave his life for should be something our president will embrace.
After all, Mr. Obama has claimed repeatedly that King's writings inspired him and helped him form his own political philosophies.
First, this "dead guy" happens to be a National Treasure.
Second, how come a critical discussion of Obama's policies is called "bashing" but a critical discussion of Bush's policies is called "telling the truth about Bush and his Cabal"?
The principles of non-violence that King gave his life for should be something our president will embrace.
After all, Mr. Obama has claimed repeatedly that King's writings inspired him and helped him form his own political philosophies.
Obama is no MLK, but neither is Ron Paul. Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot. Did Ron Paul vote against making MLK an official holiday? Voting no would mean he doesn't see him as a "National Treasure"
The grammatically correct word was "why" not how come
King was a conservative! Mid-century Southern, black preachers weren't exactly pot smoking hippies after all.
Ron Paul does not support legalizing racial discrimination against blacks. He supports freedom and liberty for all (just like Dr. King).
And when exactly did Ron Paul say he didn't support people's right to strike?
You take a jab at pot smoking hippies only to endorse a liberatarian.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
