Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2011, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,371,773 times
Reputation: 12648

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
He's ending the Iraq war. He got bin laden, like he said he would try to do. The troop draw down from Afghanistan is still in place. Libya needed help getting rid of Gaddafi and his actions were sending oil prices through the roof which threatened the world economy. He had to act.



All great reasons when it's your guy.


Let's review...madman in Libya threatens tiny portion of world's oil supplies and BO feels the need to run right in without congressional approval, declaration of war or even a note from his mom. Apparently that's OK in your world. When Bush takes proactive measures to prevent chemical weapons from getting into terrorists hands, we are trading blood for oil and Bush is a war criminal.

That about sum it up?

Last edited by momonkey; 05-21-2011 at 08:32 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2011, 08:26 AM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,768,836 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
a war we never would have gotten into if Ron Paul was president. His polices would have not aided the reasons for 9/11.


yes he did, using the same policy Ron Paul mentioned in 2001, Better late than never.


While running he did say we would illegally occupy Afghanistan which is another reason to vote against Obama unless you are a war monger.


The reason Gaddafi had so much power is the U$A gave it too him. We hold a big responsibility in that. If we had listened to Ron Paul in the first place he wouldn't have had all this power to do what he is doing now.

Quit putting costly band aids on problems we caused. Treat the cause, not the symptom.
Obama wouldn't have went into Iraq with a full out boots on the ground war. We are not illegally occupying Afghanistan. The plan is to get out soon and leave behind a government that function and not become another terrorist base.

Ron Paul is not the answer. Ron Paul's fantasy land where everything Ron Paul thinks is right doesn't have root in the real world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2011, 08:27 AM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,768,836 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
All great reasons when it's your guy.
Please make sense when you quote me and try to debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2011, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Obama wouldn't have went into Iraq with a full out boots on the ground war. We are not illegally occupying Afghanistan. The plan is to get out soon and leave behind a government that function and not become another terrorist base.

Ron Paul is not the answer. Ron Paul's fantasy land where everything Ron Paul thinks is right doesn't have root in the real world.

so if Obama does it, it's the right move but if Ron Paul mentions it 10 years earlier it's not. very telling

We ARE illegally occupying Afghanistan. No where in our constitution does it say to protect their borders. It does say to protect OUR borders. what does it say when we protect the borders of other countries better than ours? Big difference

please make sense when you quote me and try to debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2011, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,934,056 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
so if Obama does it, it's the right move but if Ron Paul mentions it 10 years earlier it's not. very telling

We ARE illegally occupying Afghanistan. No where in our constitution does it say to protect their borders. It does say to protect OUR borders. what does it say when we protect the borders of other countries better than ours? Big difference

please make sense when you quote me and try to debate.
Excuse me but when this nation is attacked they do have the right to strike back, Afganistan was where the attack on 9-11 originated and it was backed by the group (the Taliban) ruling that country. We have every legal right under law to be there.
Oh, almost forgot, RP is an idiot and if he was running the show (he never will) OBL would still be alive today.
NEXT!
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2011, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Back and Forth FRANCE
2,713 posts, read 3,023,227 times
Reputation: 1483
Didnt feel like reading the thread..Did anyone answer the question, or did the teabags find a excuse, and start to bash obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2011, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,371,773 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Obama wouldn't have went into Iraq with a full out boots on the ground war. We are not illegally occupying Afghanistan. The plan is to get out soon and leave behind a government that function and not become another terrorist base.

Ron Paul is not the answer. Ron Paul's fantasy land where everything Ron Paul thinks is right doesn't have root in the real world.


But Obama's fantasies do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2011, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,261,277 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
a war we never would have gotten into if Ron Paul was president. His polices would have not aided the reasons for 9/11.


yes he did, using the same policy Ron Paul mentioned in 2001, Better late than never.


While running he did say we would illegally occupy Afghanistan until he accomplished whatever he was trying to do. Which is another reason to vote against Obama unless you are a war monger.


The reason Gaddafi had so much power is the U$A gave it too him. We hold a big responsibility in that. If we had listened to Ron Paul in the first place he wouldn't have had all this power to do what he is doing now.

Quit putting costly band aids on problems we caused. Treat the cause, not the symptom.
Does Ron Paul pay pretty good for advertising for him?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2011, 11:02 AM
 
Location: The #1 sunshine state, Arizona.
12,169 posts, read 17,644,605 times
Reputation: 64104
Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country View Post
I really want to know did the tea party address the aircraft parts to nowhere deal?
The Tea Party stands for Taxed Enough Already, and that's all you need to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2011, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,261,277 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Excuse me but when this nation is attacked they do have the right to strike back, Afganistan was where the attack on 9-11 originated and it was backed by the group (the Taliban) ruling that country. We have every legal right under law to be there.
Oh, almost forgot, RP is an idiot and if he was running the show (he never will) OBL would still be alive today.
NEXT!
Casper
Not to be disagreeable, but since the terrorists who planned and executed 9/11 had so little to do with the Afghan government, what legal right to we have to be inside that country? Just wondering about that.

Otherwise I agree with all of your post, for a change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top