Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should The Israeli Lobby Boo Obama To His Face?
Yes. It Would Knock His Royal Highness Down a Peg. 15 50.00%
No. They should pretend to respect him while he speaks. 7 23.33%
What's AIPAC? 8 26.67%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2011, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Florida
77,005 posts, read 47,597,802 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
FOX News, Beck, Hannity or Limpballs won't air that clip I guarantee you!
FOX? Heh-heh, They will probably edit the tapes by adding some booing sounds from a Sox-Yankee's gams.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2011, 02:37 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,179,016 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
Way to try and cover the bases. Nice try. A pre-emptive article...just in case Obama doesn't get booed. Fail.

He didn't get booed. In fact, he was roundly applauded. And it had not a damn thing to do with some AIPAC edict to it's members.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 02:47 PM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,544,156 times
Reputation: 1951
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Way to try and cover the bases. Nice try. A pre-emptive article...just in case Obama doesn't get booed. Fail.

He didn't get booed. In fact, he was roundly applauded. And it had not a damn thing to do with some AIPAC edict to it's members.
The article was a response to AIPAC leadership writing a warning letter to its members about booing.

Calm down. Sheesh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,179,956 times
Reputation: 6958
In the last 15 years Israels has received close to 100 billion dollars (all free) from America.
It would be a good iddea if Obama made his speech in front of a large billboard (with 5 foot letters) that states the amount.
For every second of booing America should cut off 10 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 08:46 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,929,215 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Way to try and cover the bases. Nice try. A pre-emptive article...just in case Obama doesn't get booed. Fail.

He didn't get booed. In fact, he was roundly applauded. And it had not a damn thing to do with some AIPAC edict to it's members.
Uh..he did indeed get booed.

Obama double downs at AIPAC - Right Turn - The Washington Post

Quote:
He was not booed when he entered; most stood and offered brief applause. Still, the crowd during the speech had long periods of stony silence, and audible boos were heard when he brought up his plan to base an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal on the 1967 border lines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 08:51 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,190,023 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Weird that the video posted up thread shows the part where he was talking about the 1967 lines
and there was nothing but applause, thanks for the opinion piece though...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,929,215 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
Weird that the video posted up thread shows the part where he was talking about the 1967 lines
and there was nothing but applause, thanks for the opinion piece though...
Really? I heard a LOT of grumbling AND boos and you can certainly tell by obama's demeanor the audience was not happy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 09:05 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,190,023 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Really? I heard a LOT of grumbling AND boos and you can certainly tell by obama's demeanor the audience was not happy.
I realize you want to believe but it just ain't so.

ETA: "If there's a controversy, then it's not based in substance," Obama said in a
well-received speech. "What I did on Thursday was to say publicly what has long
been acknowledged privately. I have done so because we cannot afford to wait another
decade, or another two decades, or another three decades, to achieve peace."

Obama: '67 Borders Reflect Longstanding Policy - Politics News Story - WTOV Steubenville (http://www.wtov9.com/politics/27980833/detail.html - broken link)

Last edited by meson; 05-22-2011 at 09:19 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 09:18 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,941,962 times
Reputation: 5661
This is hypocrisy, when nothing Obama said is contrary to prior U.S. policy. How come nobody got their bonnets in a tizzy when Bush said this on June 24, 2002?

Quote:
"I've asked Secretary Powell to work intensively with Middle Eastern and international leaders to realize the vision of a Palestinian state, focusing them on a comprehensive plan to support Palestinian reform and institution building.

Ultimately, Israelis and Palestinians must address the core issues that divide them if there is to be a real peace, resolving all claims and ending the conflict between them.

This means that the Israeli occupation that began in 1967 will be ended through a settlement negotiated between the parties, based on U.N. Resolutions 242 and 338, with Israeli withdrawal to secure and recognized borders.

We must also resolve questions concerning Jerusalem, the plight and future of Palestinian refugees, and a final peace between Israel and Lebanon and Israel and a Syria that supports peace and fights terror."
UN 242 call for "withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict (1967”). That means that Bush said the same thing Obama did but the Israeli lobby still considered Bush, "pro Israel" but not "Obama.'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top