Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-26-2011, 06:07 PM
 
16,294 posts, read 28,529,007 times
Reputation: 8384

Advertisements

That stupid twit from Alaska would be only an old man's heart beat away from the nuclear football.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2011, 06:09 PM
 
12,905 posts, read 15,658,187 times
Reputation: 9394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick99 View Post
I call BS on the 'protest vote' argument. You mean to tell me you were THE Obama voter who was not in tears election night and inauguration day, witnessing 'history' being made?

The fact of the matter is most people who voted Obama did it because they were in love with the guy and they wanted to be part of history, having a hand in changing the world as the Messiah turns out to be the best (by far) President of all time.
Now you just sound as blinded and ignorant as you claim all Obama supporters to be. You just SO know everything don't you? I mean if you don't even believe what people are responding with then why are you even here? You're obviously not open to anyone else's opinion and are, essentially, at least calling me a liar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
I was thinking he's just another political hack but he's still a better choice than the tired, fear-mongering old man and the ditz.

Why is he better?

1._______________

2._______________

3._______________
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 06:21 PM
 
Location: La lune et les étoiles
18,258 posts, read 22,530,120 times
Reputation: 19593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagger View Post
I have no regrets voting for Obama.
The Bush administration really turned me off to the Republican party and even though McCain at one time may have been ok, he took a right turn to try and appease the right wing. Plus, adding Palin to the mix made it impossible to vote for his ticket.

I think Obama has done pretty well, especially considering what Bush left him with. I don't see anyone on the horizon that can beat him. Lot's of time left though till November, 2012.
100% this ^^^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 06:24 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minethatbird View Post
Gas prices here are over $4 a gallon here with BO's non-ties to oil companies .... are we supposed to feel better because BO doesn't have these ties?

BO's non-ties to oil companies?

BP isn't an oil company?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
Just to clue you in the "I can see Russia from my house" was part of the famous Saturday Night Live skit as they were uttered by Tina Fey playing Palin to parody what the Alaska governor had actually said in an interview with Gibson from September 2008.

Do you know what "parody" is? It isn't something you get mixed up with taking it as fact.

The parody comes from when asked by Charlie Gibson "What insight into Russian actions particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of this state give you?"

Palin responded: "They're our next door neighbors. And you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska."

And you can actually see Russian land from Alaska.





You missed the best part!

GIBSON: Let me ask you about some specific national security situations.

PALIN: Sure.

GIBSON: Let’s start, because we are near Russia, let’s start with Russia and Georgia.
The administration has said we’ve got to maintain the territorial integrity of Georgia. Do you believe the United States should try to restore Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia and Abkhazia?

PALIN: First off, we’re going to continue good relations with Saakashvili there. I was able to speak with him the other day and giving him my commitment, as John McCain’s running mate, that we will be committed to Georgia. And we’ve got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable and we have to keep…

GIBSON: You believe unprovoked.

PALIN: I do believe unprovoked and we have got to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there. I think it was unfortunate. That manifestation that we saw with that invasion of Georgia shows us some steps backwards that Russia has recently taken away from the race toward a more democratic nation with democratic ideals. That’s why we have to keep an eye on Russia.
And, Charlie, you’re in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They’re very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.

GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they’re doing in Georgia?

PALIN: Well, I’m giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along…
We cannot repeat the Cold War. We are thankful that, under Reagan, we won the Cold War, without a shot fired, also. We’ve learned lessons from that in our relationship with Russia, previously the Soviet Union.
We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.
As it is pointed out by Newsbusters, ‘Palin’s extended remarks about defending our NATO allies were edited out to make it seem that she was ready to go to war with Russia. ‘
GIBSON: And under the NATO treaty, wouldn’t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?

PALIN: Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help.
But NATO, I think, should include Ukraine, definitely, at this point and I think that we need to — especially with new leadership coming in on January 20, being sworn on, on either ticket, we have got to make sure that we strengthen our allies, our ties with each one of those NATO members.
We have got to make sure that that is the group that can be counted upon to defend one another in a very dangerous world today.

GIBSON: And you think it would be worth it to the United States, Georgia is worth it to the United States to go to war if Russia were to invade.

PALIN: What I think is that smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a larger power is something for us to be vigilant against. We have got to be cognizant of what the consequences are if a larger power is able to take over smaller democratic countries.
And we have got to be vigilant. We have got to show the support, in this case, for Georgia. The support that we can show is economic sanctions perhaps against Russia, if this is what it leads to.
It doesn’t have to lead to war and it doesn’t have to lead, as I said, to a Cold War, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, again, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries.
His mission, if it is to control energy supplies, also, coming from and through Russia, that’s a dangerous position for our world to be in, if we were to allow that to happen.


Unedited Palin Interview ‹ Right Across the Atlantic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 06:40 PM
 
898 posts, read 827,710 times
Reputation: 590
Wow, the left really is made up of idiots and fools based on the responses in this thread. They're gonna hate 2012.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 06:54 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,280,777 times
Reputation: 3296
First half black guy was great and historic in proving there is little racism in America these days.

Outside of that, I knew he was a leftist socialist turd and about the worst person for the job when he took over. I was right. His Presidency has been a near total failure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 07:03 PM
 
11,155 posts, read 15,705,136 times
Reputation: 4209
I was thinking that deregulation of the markets didn't work out so well and it was time for someone to come in with a little government intervention. He's been an incredibly impressive president - so many successes. I've been most impressed with his ability to walk the line between the left and the right in digging us out of this mess. He's got my vote in '12 barring any major mishaps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 07:07 PM
 
11,155 posts, read 15,705,136 times
Reputation: 4209
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
You missed the best part!
GIBSON: Let me ask you about some specific national security situations.

PALIN: Sure.

GIBSON: Let’s start, because we are near Russia, let’s start with Russia and Georgia.
The administration has said we’ve got to maintain the territorial integrity of Georgia. Do you believe the United States should try to restore Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia and Abkhazia?

PALIN: First off, we’re going to continue good relations with Saakashvili there. I was able to speak with him the other day and giving him my commitment, as John McCain’s running mate, that we will be committed to Georgia. And we’ve got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable and we have to keep…

GIBSON: You believe unprovoked.

PALIN: I do believe unprovoked and we have got to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there. I think it was unfortunate. That manifestation that we saw with that invasion of Georgia shows us some steps backwards that Russia has recently taken away from the race toward a more democratic nation with democratic ideals. That’s why we have to keep an eye on Russia.
And, Charlie, you’re in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They’re very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.

GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they’re doing in Georgia?

PALIN: Well, I’m giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along…
We cannot repeat the Cold War. We are thankful that, under Reagan, we won the Cold War, without a shot fired, also. We’ve learned lessons from that in our relationship with Russia, previously the Soviet Union.
We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.
As it is pointed out by Newsbusters, ‘Palin’s extended remarks about defending our NATO allies were edited out to make it seem that she was ready to go to war with Russia. ‘
GIBSON: And under the NATO treaty, wouldn’t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?

PALIN: Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help.
But NATO, I think, should include Ukraine, definitely, at this point and I think that we need to — especially with new leadership coming in on January 20, being sworn on, on either ticket, we have got to make sure that we strengthen our allies, our ties with each one of those NATO members.
We have got to make sure that that is the group that can be counted upon to defend one another in a very dangerous world today.

GIBSON: And you think it would be worth it to the United States, Georgia is worth it to the United States to go to war if Russia were to invade.

PALIN: What I think is that smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a larger power is something for us to be vigilant against. We have got to be cognizant of what the consequences are if a larger power is able to take over smaller democratic countries.
And we have got to be vigilant. We have got to show the support, in this case, for Georgia. The support that we can show is economic sanctions perhaps against Russia, if this is what it leads to.
It doesn’t have to lead to war and it doesn’t have to lead, as I said, to a Cold War, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, again, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries.
His mission, if it is to control energy supplies, also, coming from and through Russia, that’s a dangerous position for our world to be in, if we were to allow that to happen.


Unedited Palin Interview ‹ Right Across the Atlantic
Wow. That's an embarrassing interview. I forgot how much she rambles when she can't answer a question and doesn't grasp the potential ramifications of what she says. Amazing she thought she could be a world leader.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top