Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:36 AM
 
46,281 posts, read 27,099,738 times
Reputation: 11126

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
This thread is about a lawsuit that the US Chambers of Commerce filed against Arizona.
Then why did it go to court?

Better?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Then why did it go to court? Why did obama fight it and take arazonia to court.
The WH believes the Constitution is correct in requiring Immigration rules and Laws are the duty of the Federal Govt. Obama has repeated asked Congress to resolve the Immigration and Border issues. Congress is the ONLY entity that can do that. It is the political posturing that is inhibiting the process. In the past, it was the Dems that did not want a Repub Admin to be credited for resolving it, currently it is the Repubs that don't want a Dem Admin to be credited for resolving it. That is where we are and where we have been for decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Thats not at all what you wrote, and you are still wrong. The Supreme Court ruled in 2000, (Bush vs Gore), that there is no right to vote in america

The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1.
The fifteenth amendment (onward). What you're arguing here is "electoral college". In any case, nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:42 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
Not if either of the laws is unconstitutional as with anti-marijuana laws.

Reading Comprehension wasn't your best asset.

"That mirror Federal laws"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
So you would fine businesses who mistakenly hire an illegal, but yet the federal agencies that permit them entry, bear no responsibility
Yeah, these people just show up, are permitted and move on taking over your jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:43 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
i'm not trying to provoke anything, I simply quoted the Supreme Courts ruling that says you are wrong. Last I checked, the Suprme Court was the final say so on laws, not an anonymous web poster.
But you didn't accurately quote me. hmmmm.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:43 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
The WH believes the Constitution is correct in requiring Immigration rules and Laws are the duty of the Federal Govt.
The Constitution doesnt even mention immigration.. It does mention naturalization, but illegal immigrats are not naturalized.
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Obama has repeated asked Congress to resolve the Immigration and Border issues.
For example?
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Congress is the ONLY entity that can do that.
Democratic Congress fails yet again..
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
It is the political posturing that is inhibiting the process. In the past, it was the Dems that did not want a Repub Admin to be credited for resolving it, currently it is the Repubs that don't want a Dem Admin to be credited for resolving it. That is where we are and where we have been for decades.
Ooh bull, Democrats had all 3 branches of government and the GOP couldnt stop them if they wanted to..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Ooh bull, Democrats had all 3 branches of government and the GOP couldnt stop them if they wanted to..
They could and did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,538,911 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Those facts things just confuse.

Only liberals need facts. Conservos just substitute Fox.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:44 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
The WH believes the Constitution is correct in requiring Immigration rules and Laws are the duty of the Federal Govt. Obama has repeated asked Congress to resolve the Immigration and Border issues. Congress is the ONLY entity that can do that. It is the political posturing that is inhibiting the process. In the past, it was the Dems that did not want a Repub Admin to be credited for resolving it, currently it is the Repubs that don't want a Dem Admin to be credited for resolving it. That is where we are and where we have been for decades.

Congress did that in 1986.
Congress is telling the King, to enforce the laws on the books and you will see our problem disappear completely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top