Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-04-2007, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,794 posts, read 40,990,020 times
Reputation: 62169

Advertisements

I was looking at these July poll numbers (the line is mine). When it gets closer to the rubber meeting the road, where do you think the votes under the line will go, presuming (maybe erroneously) that the 4 above the line are still in the race?

Will they:

A. throw their support to the candidate that comes closest to the ideology of the candidate they originally supported or in the case of "not sure" their own ideology.

B. vote for the candidate that has the best chance of defeating the probable Democrat nominee (whose identity may be more apparent closer to Super Tuesday).

C. vote for the person they think is the most capable leader, no matter the ideology.

D. decline to vote.

E. vote for a Democrat.

F. other (say what "other" is)

Note: My presumption is that no one with a 2% or less standing in the polls has a chance of winning the general election as a third party candidate or surpassing everyone in the current Republican Top 4 in the primary.

Also, do any or all of these guys with lousy poll numbers (2% or less) have the money to stick it out until the end? Should they?


July Poll (NBC)

Rudy Giuliani 33%

Fred Thompson 20%

John McCain 17%

Mitt Romney 11%

----------------------------------


Tommy Thompson 2%

Sam Brownback 2%

Ron Paul 2%

Tom Tancredo 1%

Mike Huckabee 1%

Duncan Hunter 1%

Other 2%

None 2%

Not sure 7%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-04-2007, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,208,139 times
Reputation: 7373
Good question. My sense is that the Paul votes stay with Paul, and the others go towards Thompson and Romney. If Thompson and Romney keep splitting votes, I wonder if Giuliani can maintain his lead going into the convention, but at about a 40% level of total vote. At this point in time, I think McCain will eventually drop out, with some of his vote going to Rudy, so I don't know if this may give him the 50% plus 1 needed to pull out a win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2007, 05:01 PM
 
Location: Texas
451 posts, read 835,457 times
Reputation: 134
I really don't know.

I just started wondering if two of the top four don't join forces as president/VP will the one of them strike a deal with Ron Paul as VP so he won't become the Ross Perot of 2008? I could be way off I have no Idea.

Personally I hope Duncan Hunter gets on the GOP ticket as VP because I would have a very hard time voting for a any combo that had Ron Paul in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2007, 06:02 PM
 
2,433 posts, read 6,676,051 times
Reputation: 1065
I'm usually pretty good at predicting these things, but I have to admit this election cycle is pretty much up in the air at this point. No republican is really worth voting for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2007, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts & Hilton Head, SC
10,007 posts, read 15,647,185 times
Reputation: 8649
I'd bet Fred Thompson with Romney probably willing to join the ticket as VP. When McCain drops out - his support (what there is left of it) will break for Thompson.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2007, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,794 posts, read 40,990,020 times
Reputation: 62169
Default Giuliani

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprinter View Post
I really don't know.

I just started wondering if two of the top four don't join forces as president/VP will the one of them strike a deal with Ron Paul as VP so he won't become the Ross Perot of 2008? I could be way off I have no Idea.

Personally I hope Duncan Hunter gets on the GOP ticket as VP because I would have a very hard time voting for a any combo that had Ron Paul in it.
Agreed (couldn't vote for Paul but with 2% poll numbers I don't think any candidate would entertain him as a running mate) and I also like Duncan Hunter but I fear a Giuliani/Hunter ticket will lose the support of the flyover states (where I live). I feel that if Giuliani (big city boy) wins the nomination, he needs a guy on his ticket who can campaign in the flyover states. In other words, not Duncan Hunter.

Despite what Republicans and the media say about Giuliani's position on social issues, I think his biggest shortcoming (and I like him very much) is that he's a big city guy who has never really lived anyplace else. For example, we have crime in the suburbs and drugs in rural America, Rudy. Can what you did for crime in New York City work in the burbs and rural areas, too? We don't have squeegie guys. I don't hear him talking about suburbia or rural America issues at all. That's his shortcoming, I think. For that reason, I think he's better paired with Fred Thompson (who has Senate experience and can relate to rural and suburban America). Plus, they both seem to be in sync on national security, taxes and foreign policy issues.

Mitt Romney, to me, doesn't offer anything different. He's the lite version of the other Republican candidates on various issues. I also think he doesn't have a shot of winning in the general election against any Democrat candidate.

John McCain --- I wasn't voting for him before he declared. Every time I think of him he's whispering in Ted Kennedy's ear.

I also hope Newt Gingrich doesn't run. He's a smart man but I think just about every Democrat candidate could beat him.

I think Ron Paul's 2% will go for a Green Party candidate or a Democrat.

The others (Hunter, Huckabee, Tancredo, Brownback) though, and the undecided, I have no idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2007, 10:12 PM
 
Location: Warwick, NY
1,174 posts, read 5,901,566 times
Reputation: 1023
Until Thompson and Bloomberg join the fray I'm keeping the predictions to a minimum. No matter what happens though, I'm still voting for Paul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2007, 10:49 PM
 
2,433 posts, read 6,676,051 times
Reputation: 1065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason_Els View Post
Until Thompson and Bloomberg join the fray I'm keeping the predictions to a minimum. No matter what happens though, I'm still voting for Paul.

I think I'm going to support Paul as well. He's a straight shooter and has a common sense approach to the issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2007, 10:57 PM
 
Location: Heartland Florida
9,324 posts, read 26,739,729 times
Reputation: 5038
Out of that bunch, why wouldn't everyone vote for Paul?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2007, 11:19 PM
 
Location: Warwick, NY
1,174 posts, read 5,901,566 times
Reputation: 1023
Quote:
Originally Posted by tallrick View Post
Out of that bunch, why wouldn't everyone vote for Paul?
Because they either want to vote for a winner so they can feel like a winner too or they're voting their morality because they feel it's most important for a politician to share the same moral values.

Most people are sheep and they vote for whomever they're told to by someone else. This has been true since Athens:

Quote:
The worst display of inconsistency the assembly showed, however, was after the revolt on the island of Lesbos had been defeated. In a fit of anger, the assembly decided to put all men in the city of Mytilene to death while enslaving the women and children. The next day, however, some members began to have second thoughts and the issue was brought up for a second vote where the decision of the previous day was reversed. Since a trireme had already been dispatched to deliver the orders, a second was forced to set out to recall the first ship and arrived just in time to save the city. The Athenian general, Cleon, chided the assembly, saying it was better to have bad laws enforced consistently rather than good laws enforced inconsistently. -Daily Reckoning
The Athenian Assembly consisted of whomever happened to be in the agora (which still survives) at the moment. Leaders would seal off the exits, expel any slaves or non-Athenian males, and orate to the masses who would then vote on what to do. Constituency would change by day or even the hour. It was chaotic but then Athens (and Greece) managed to become a major world power for the time so they did something right.

Last edited by Jason_Els; 08-04-2007 at 11:28 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top