U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-29-2011, 07:35 PM
 
592 posts, read 1,829,245 times
Reputation: 683

Advertisements

Is it true minorities are given "extra points" when competing with other applicants for federal and private sector jobs?

Anyone on here ever work for the federal government or for a corporation as a hiring manager? If so, were minorities given "extra points" and pushed ahead of whites?

Last edited by heeha; 05-29-2011 at 08:37 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2011, 08:05 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,362 posts, read 56,100,605 times
Reputation: 16425
Your question may be poorly worded. For example, there may be no formal "points" yet minorities could get preferential treatment. So, the answer to your question could be "no", but the implication could be "yes".

The numbers/positions/advancement/pay/promotion/firing of minorities and women is tracked very closely by large corporations with government contracts. Why do these corporations perform this detailed tracking?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2011, 12:08 AM
 
31,385 posts, read 18,665,146 times
Reputation: 14472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles View Post
The numbers/positions/advancement/pay/promotion/firing of minorities and women is tracked very closely by large corporations with government contracts. Why do these corporations perform this detailed tracking?
Those numbers are required by law to be kept from those who make hiring decisions. As usual there seems to be some confusion regarding quotas and what is permissible affirmative action. The latter being the ability of a firm to prove that it has made an affirmative attempt to hire disadvantage minorities and women. For that purpose and purpose alone employers may keep a record of the race, ethnicity and sex of applicants but that it is illegal under Title VII to use that information as a basis of a hiring decision.

I know this isn't what too many white folks believe but hey.
Employers may legitimately need information about their employees or applicants race for affirmative action purposes and/or to track applicant flow. One way to obtain racial information and simultaneously guard against discriminatory selection is for employers to use separate forms or otherwise keep the information about an applicant's race separate from the application. In that way, the employer can capture the information it needs but ensure that it is not used in the selection decision.

Unless the information is for such a legitimate purpose, pre-employment questions about race can suggest that race will be used as a basis for making selection decisions. If the information is used in the selection decision and members of particular racial groups are excluded from employment, the inquiries can constitute evidence of discrimination.
Facts About Race/Color Discrimination
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2011, 05:24 AM
 
5,757 posts, read 5,931,106 times
Reputation: 2348
I have done hiring for the federal government. I have advertised 4 positions. Not once was I ever pushed to hire a minority nor were there points given to a minority. Preferential treatment is given to veterans and military spouses. That wording is clear on the job announcement as well as how many points are giving for each type of status.

The only thing were were encourage to do was to have a variation of people on the interview team, i.e. a man, a woman, a minority--that sort of thing. However, this was also not forced but just encouraged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2011, 08:35 AM
 
15,254 posts, read 4,760,210 times
Reputation: 3352
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Those numbers are required by law to be kept from those who make hiring decisions. As usual there seems to be some confusion regarding quotas and what is permissible affirmative action. The latter being the ability of a firm to prove that it has made an affirmative attempt to hire disadvantage minorities and women. For that purpose and purpose alone employers may keep a record of the race, ethnicity and sex of applicants but that it is illegal under Title VII to use that information as a basis of a hiring decision.

I know this isn't what too many white folks believe but hey.
Employers may legitimately need information about their employees or applicants race for affirmative action purposes and/or to track applicant flow. One way to obtain racial information and simultaneously guard against discriminatory selection is for employers to use separate forms or otherwise keep the information about an applicant's race separate from the application. In that way, the employer can capture the information it needs but ensure that it is not used in the selection decision.

Unless the information is for such a legitimate purpose, pre-employment questions about race can suggest that race will be used as a basis for making selection decisions. If the information is used in the selection decision and members of particular racial groups are excluded from employment, the inquiries can constitute evidence of discrimination.
Facts About Race/Color Discrimination
I dis-agree.

I worked for a national company that was "sued" by the fed because they didn't have enough minorities,(in the feds mind).

When the Consent Decree was signed the company agreed to hire x number of minorities (many were not qualified).

When the company reached its magic number they did every thing they could to keep these people on board. No discipline against them what so ever.

We had the last one hired who gave the company it's quota, ask why were were never at the weekly dinner supplied by the company. Duh, we weren't invited. it was ONLY for those minorities needed to fulfill the quota.

Bottom line, if a company doesn't meet its gov't defined number of minorities, the gov't takes them to court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2011, 08:41 AM
 
1,944 posts, read 707,133 times
Reputation: 915
Quote:
Originally Posted by heeha View Post
Is it true minorities are given "extra points" when competing with other applicants for federal and private sector jobs?

Anyone on here ever work for the federal government or for a corporation as a hiring manager? If so, were minorities given "extra points" and pushed ahead of whites?
Yes, and that is called affirmative action. It is done automatically and some who will say that they have never received affirmative action are either lying or just don't realize that it is automatic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2011, 08:44 AM
 
15,231 posts, read 7,668,541 times
Reputation: 7523
as for the government, the points are designed to give a slight advantage for the civil service exam grading. for instance if you were a member of the armed forces you got extra points, if you were a minority you got extra points. basically all it did was let those that got the extra points to move up eligibility scale to be hired for a government position. they still had to interview for a job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2011, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
15,952 posts, read 12,658,821 times
Reputation: 7755
Quote:
Originally Posted by heeha View Post
Is it true minorities are given "extra points" when competing with other applicants for federal and private sector jobs?

Anyone on here ever work for the federal government or for a corporation as a hiring manager? If so, were minorities given "extra points" and pushed ahead of whites?
I was and there were not. The only additional points I know of are Veterans and some Native Americans on the Reservation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2011, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
9,400 posts, read 8,024,661 times
Reputation: 6070
Minorities do not get additional points for federal hiring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2011, 09:12 AM
 
31,385 posts, read 18,665,146 times
Reputation: 14472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
I dis-agree.

I worked for a national company that was "sued" by the fed because they didn't have enough minorities,(in the feds mind).
The "Fed" doesn't wander around looking for firms to sue. If a suit was filed and the EEOC joins in on that suit it was based upon a complaint by an employee or an a person seeking employment.

Quote:
When the Consent Decree was signed the company agreed to hire x number of minorities (many were not qualified).
The consent decree is the result of a settlement by your firm stipulating to charges that it was involved in a pattern of discriminatory actions in either hiring and promotion or both. Developing an aggressive affirmative action plan is a court ordered remedy to redress past wrongs and is not to be confused with a voluntary "affirmative action" program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $89,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top