Why do the males get no say? (abortion, elect, money)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That would mean men could hit and split and produce untold numbers of offspring without consequence. Thats really isn't a good idea for society and that's why the government got involved in the first place.
There needs to be a better solution before child support goes away. Better than blaming women for letting men get inside them I mean because that just makes men seem like the weaker sex...?
Most of the time, the woman sabotage birth control. Men are already being weakened by misandric feminism.
And most men don't hit and split. Women purposely keep fathers out of their children's lives.
I can't believe how many males on this thread don't give a damn about what happens to their own child once it is born, even if they hadn't wanted a child before they unzippped their zipper.
Why do you need to support your own child? Because it's your child.
Child support is a corrupt feminist legislation. The only people who support it are women and White Knights.
Which is why I believe the government, which is feminist run, should stay out of people's personal lives, mainly men's lives.
Well -- AND the taxpayers.
The problem is we have a very generous welfare system and a socialist government that confiscates the incomes of working responsible people to redistribute to those who are not.
Poor unwed mothers cranking out babies are going to be given either taxpayers' money OR child support -- and more often than not they get both. Why should anyone else have to support children who are not their own?
At least the baby daddy got the pleasure of sex with the woman he knocked up -- so yeah, he can pay, why should taxpayers have to pay?
Male politicians do have the power to end the gender-based double standards and give men a say. But too many of them are brainwashed by the lies of women and feminists. America needs to remove manginas from high positions in the government.
What "say" do you want the government to give males? The right to force a woman to bear a child? The right to force a woman to have an abortion?
And which of these standards would you apply equally to a female?
Applying them all still leaves you with the fact that the woman is the only one getting pregant. That can't be applied equally so that means things can't be equal right?
If a female doesn't want the responsibility/financial stress that goes along with parenthood, she can get an abortion and never look back. Even if the male wants to keep the baby, the female has the power to get an abortion.
Technically it isn't fair because you would think if the guy wanted to keep the child to be aborted he could since he is the dad.
You would also think if she wanted to keep it and he wanted no financial responsibility that he should legally leave it all to the woman without child support.
The actual fact is that a different thing happens. They say it is support and a fairness for the child, but in truth the government doesn't want even more welfare babies and women forced to go through a birth would be considered going through a torture from hell in their selfishness to ever have a baby they don't want.
It's all selfishness IMO with government stepping in to avoid the role as best it can of being responsible for paying for more children. They rather pay Planned Parenthood to kill them all, especially the black ones. Sad IMO.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.