Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-19-2012, 12:33 AM
 
Location: Armsanta Sorad
5,648 posts, read 8,053,250 times
Reputation: 2462

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flicka4 View Post
That would mean men could hit and split and produce untold numbers of offspring without consequence. Thats really isn't a good idea for society and that's why the government got involved in the first place.

There needs to be a better solution before child support goes away. Better than blaming women for letting men get inside them I mean because that just makes men seem like the weaker sex...?
Most of the time, the woman sabotage birth control. Men are already being weakened by misandric feminism.

And most men don't hit and split. Women purposely keep fathers out of their children's lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2012, 12:34 AM
 
56 posts, read 45,229 times
Reputation: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by West of Encino View Post
Most of the time, the woman sabotage birth control. Men are already being weakened by misandric feminism.

And most men don't hit and split. Women purposely keep fathers out of their children's lives.
Well if that's what you think there isn't much point in reasoning is there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 12:50 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,361,465 times
Reputation: 12647
Quote:
Originally Posted by psulions2007 View Post
The males get a say. It's called deciding whether or not they use a condom. Beyond that, it's the female's decision since it is her body.

The female's body has her DNA.

The baby's body has its own unique DNA.

The only body which is destroyed by abortion has the baby's DNA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 12:51 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,376,260 times
Reputation: 4113
Whine Whine Whine....

I can't believe how many males on this thread don't give a damn about what happens to their own child once it is born, even if they hadn't wanted a child before they unzippped their zipper.

Why do you need to support your own child? Because it's your child.

Grow up boys.

Last edited by Ceist; 02-19-2012 at 01:07 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 12:54 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,361,465 times
Reputation: 12647
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
Of course men have the same reproductive rights as women.
Get it snipped.
Dont have sex.
Have protected sex.
There, feel better now?

And which of these standards would you apply equally to a female?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 01:10 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,668,317 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by West of Encino View Post
Child support is a corrupt feminist legislation. The only people who support it are women and White Knights.

Which is why I believe the government, which is feminist run, should stay out of people's personal lives, mainly men's lives.
Well -- AND the taxpayers.

The problem is we have a very generous welfare system and a socialist government that confiscates the incomes of working responsible people to redistribute to those who are not.

Poor unwed mothers cranking out babies are going to be given either taxpayers' money OR child support -- and more often than not they get both. Why should anyone else have to support children who are not their own?

At least the baby daddy got the pleasure of sex with the woman he knocked up -- so yeah, he can pay, why should taxpayers have to pay?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 01:19 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,376,260 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by West of Encino View Post
Male politicians do have the power to end the gender-based double standards and give men a say. But too many of them are brainwashed by the lies of women and feminists. America needs to remove manginas from high positions in the government.
What "say" do you want the government to give males? The right to force a woman to bear a child? The right to force a woman to have an abortion?

Rather obvious that you are a misogynist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 01:21 AM
 
56 posts, read 45,229 times
Reputation: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
And which of these standards would you apply equally to a female?
Applying them all still leaves you with the fact that the woman is the only one getting pregant. That can't be applied equally so that means things can't be equal right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 01:24 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,376,260 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by city_data91 View Post
I support a woman's right to choose abortion

I support a woman's right to keep the baby

But I don't support a woman's "right" to make a man pay child support on kids he never wanted
So you don't give a damn about the wellbeing of children. Just the 'wellbeing' of your wallet.

I support you getting a vasectomy. asap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2012, 01:29 AM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,277,740 times
Reputation: 3296
Quote:
Originally Posted by city_data91 View Post
If a female doesn't want the responsibility/financial stress that goes along with parenthood, she can get an abortion and never look back. Even if the male wants to keep the baby, the female has the power to get an abortion.
Technically it isn't fair because you would think if the guy wanted to keep the child to be aborted he could since he is the dad.
You would also think if she wanted to keep it and he wanted no financial responsibility that he should legally leave it all to the woman without child support.
The actual fact is that a different thing happens. They say it is support and a fairness for the child, but in truth the government doesn't want even more welfare babies and women forced to go through a birth would be considered going through a torture from hell in their selfishness to ever have a baby they don't want.

It's all selfishness IMO with government stepping in to avoid the role as best it can of being responsible for paying for more children. They rather pay Planned Parenthood to kill them all, especially the black ones. Sad IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top