Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's funny, because just a few years ago, North Dakota's population had declined to the point where it was smaller than it was before statehood in 1889. They were actually trying to sell entire abandoned towns as a means of raising money. (That effort didn't pan out very well, because people weren't interested in dealing with North Dakota winters, although I must say, if I'd had the money, I would've bought one of those towns!)
Oops, sorry, wrong half But I don't think it makes much of a difference
I don't think I would want to live anywhere between Idaho and Minnesota Even if some landscapes are nice, no need to live there, a week of vacation will do, then I would start missing my palm trees and Southern girls
They don't print enough money for me to live there no matter how good their economy is. More power to them. Let them count their money....after they take their gloves off and thaw their fingers out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But I don't think it makes much of a difference 
Even if some landscapes are nice, no need to live there, a week of vacation will do, then I would start missing my palm trees and Southern girls 
