Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2011, 11:29 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,297 posts, read 54,147,563 times
Reputation: 40606

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
I will toss it so long a you do.
You started it and you're stupid if you think you're getting the last at bat

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
UN was the lynchpin as the United States could not be considered an outlaw state so long as it had UN sanction. UN represents the community of nations and there can be no extra-legal accusations if a country has their approval. Terrorism has many forms but it is never legal. This UN approval maintains the U.S. as acting in a legal fashion which is something that terrorist non-national organizations or state sponsored terrorists can claim.

I wonder if this UN approval is what keeps now retired U.S. leaders from facing international war crimes tribunals.
Using the UN as justification for anything is a sure sign there's no real justification.

BTW, If you're so insisten the US does not involve itself in acts of terror, what do you call it when we deliberately target foreign civilian leaders when they don't follow our agenda?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2011, 11:31 AM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,283,332 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
Again you are stupid if you believe war is clear and simple.

War was considered necessary in no small part by Hussein's own actions. The U.S. miliary, intelligence, poltical leaders, European, and UN believed it. Invasion was authorized after one year of analysis.

Basic definitions are needed here. Terror is synonymous with illegal manifestations of violence against any target. War is bound by terms of conduct against civilians and the military. The U.S. has not deliberately targeted civilians since the bombing of Japan in 1945.

JFK, RFK, MLK, the list is endless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Miami, FL
8,087 posts, read 9,796,524 times
Reputation: 6650
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Using the UN as justification for anything is a sure sign there's no real justification.
Community of nations at work going back to Korean intervention. There has to be a system of order among nations.

The U.S. as the nominal leader of the free world at that time could not act in any other fashion than to secure UN approval for intervention. U.S. also trying to bring as many other nations into the global war against terror as possible. Best means would be to use the UN. Doing so would also force states which harbored terroists to expel them or face consequences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 12:48 PM
 
Location: US, California - federalist
2,794 posts, read 3,672,370 times
Reputation: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
Attacked the U.S. or U.S. persons and properties on a number of occassions.

Sept 11, 2001 being the notable example.
The evil drug empire does worse every year; and we already surrendered to that empire with the repeal of the Prohibition amendment.

Were they really a "problem" or merely the means to redistribute income?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 12:53 PM
 
Location: US, California - federalist
2,794 posts, read 3,672,370 times
Reputation: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
That was not known at the time. I never said the war was a mistake. Only that we, The United States, are not terrorists. That is what Al-Qaeda is.
How do you define terrorism? What if they were simply Vandal imitators?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 01:41 PM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,981 posts, read 24,644,548 times
Reputation: 9727
Quote:
Originally Posted by dorado0359 View Post
When did the Taliban become an upright, law abiding political organization, in good standing.

Afghan leader says U.S. in contact with Taliban - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110618/ts_nm/us_afghanistan_talks - broken link)
Not much choice there. You can't win against the Taliban, so you have to choose between admitting defeat or trying to achieve a kind of ceasefire in order not to lose face - and billions and billions of dollars in the future...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,724,336 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by dorado0359 View Post
When did the Taliban become an upright, law abiding political organization, in good standing.

Afghan leader says U.S. in contact with Taliban - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110618/ts_nm/us_afghanistan_talks - broken link)

While Reagan was President.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 03:05 PM
 
46,861 posts, read 25,809,157 times
Reputation: 29333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
The Liberals do!
<cough > Iran-Contra. <cough>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 03:13 PM
 
46,861 posts, read 25,809,157 times
Reputation: 29333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
UN authorized invasion of both Iraq and Afghanistan.
Most certainly not Iraq. The US tried every trick in the book to get UN authorization and ended up falling back on the idea that the US had the right to invade and enforce Security Council resolutions over the express protests of the very same Security Council.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Miami, FL
8,087 posts, read 9,796,524 times
Reputation: 6650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Most certainly not Iraq. The US tried every trick in the book to get UN authorization and ended up falling back on the idea that the US had the right to invade and enforce Security Council resolutions over the express protests of the very same Security Council.
Security Resolution 678 and 1441
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top