Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-22-2011, 12:20 PM
 
3,115 posts, read 7,136,021 times
Reputation: 1808

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
And it did increase costs and it does nothing to benefit the consumer.

It's just another bureaucratic layer of regulation and cost.

Do you really think people need to be told that sugar cookies have a lot of sugar? Do you really think that people need to be told that potato chips have a lot of salt?
It's a lot of benefit to me, and to many others who share my desire to eat food with fewer ingredients, lower sodium, etc. Of course people don't need to know that sugar cookies have sugar, or that potato chips have salt, but I regularly read labels to decide which products to choose.

Some recent examples: canned tomatoes (my own homegrown, organic tomatoes aren't ripe, and I wanted to make sauce) - checked the ingredients to make sure they contained fewer than five ingredients, and all were natural. Also checked sodium count.

Canned beans (wanted to make dip for last minute party, so didn't have time to soak my own) - made sure the only ingredients were beans and salt, and checked sodium content. Did you know most major brands, including store brands of beans contain HFCS? Gross!

There is no question that the labeling allows consumers even more CHOICE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-22-2011, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
I dont, but many, many folks do.
And your jab at me has, what, exactly to do with what I posted?

It wasn't meant to be personal. So let me restate.

The problem can be easily solved if people quit buying bad food products. We don't need the government telling people what to eat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,005,830 times
Reputation: 9418
Quote:
Originally Posted by coastalgirl View Post
It's a lot of benefit to me, and to many others who share my desire to eat food with fewer ingredients, lower sodium, etc. Of course people don't need to know that sugar cookies have sugar, or that potato chips have salt, but I regularly read labels to decide which products to choose.

Some recent examples: canned tomatoes (my own homegrown, organic tomatoes aren't ripe, and I wanted to make sauce) - checked the ingredients to make sure they contained fewer than five ingredients, and all were natural. Also checked sodium count.

Canned beans (wanted to make dip for last minute party, so didn't have time to soak my own) - made sure the only ingredients were beans and salt, and checked sodium content. Did you know most major brands, including store brands of beans contain HFCS? Gross!

There is no question that the labeling allows consumers even more CHOICE.
Then educate yourself. Take a nutrition class. Don't settle for being told what you can and can't eat. Educate yourself so you can think for yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 12:23 PM
 
3,115 posts, read 7,136,021 times
Reputation: 1808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whyte Byrd View Post
Then educate yourself. Take a nutrition class. Don't settle for being told what you can and can't eat. Educate yourself so you can think for yourself.
What are you talking about? Did you even read what I wrote?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by coastalgirl View Post
There is no question that the labeling allows consumers even more CHOICE.
I agree and that is good. It's just not a valid role of government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
You may assume all you wish.
Freedom does not require knowledge. Freedom requires only choice. Knowledge may be helpful, but it is not required for freedom. Regardless, this isn't about knowledge; it's about limiting the choices.
I can't see any other possibility. As for knowledge and freedom, well, I am not surprised at your take. The way I see it... you can't be free unless you are aware of your choices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,416 posts, read 37,001,401 times
Reputation: 15560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
It wasn't meant to be personal. So let me restate.

The problem can be easily solved if people quit buying bad food products. We don't need the government telling people what to eat.
Then one needs to start with Big Food, and I honestly dont see them reformulating product.
They know they have a lock with the fat/sugar/salt trigger to overeating, they will not stop adding that to pre-packaged foods until they are forced to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,005,830 times
Reputation: 9418
Quote:
Originally Posted by coastalgirl View Post
What are you talking about? Did you even read what I wrote?
Yes, I read it. I don't know how I managed to quote you though. Sorry. I was intending to quote someone else but my page minimized (or jumped ahead or back rather--not sure what happened) and I hit the back button and responded to the quote without seeing the wrong one came back to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Monsanto rules, government sucks?
- Your typical republican.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2011, 12:30 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,321,408 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
It wasn't meant to be personal. So let me restate.

The problem can be easily solved if people quit buying bad food products. We don't need the government telling people what to eat.
People don't know it's bad.

It's really packaged nice.

A Review of Beetlejuice’s favorite Candy – The Zagnut Bar | Rocket Fizz Las Vegas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top