Expect The 'Unexpected'! (jobs, jobs, jobs) (unemployed, economy, claims, income)

[MrClose]

Anyone see a pattern?


April 2009 – New Jobless Claims Rise Unexpectedly (AP)

June 2009 – New Jobless Claims Rise Unexpectedly To 627K, 6.7M Still Unemployed (Huffington Post)

August 2009 – Jobless Claims Rise Unexpectedly (Washington Post)

October 2009 – New jobless claims rise more than expected (AP)

December 2009 – Jobless claims rise unexpectedly (Christian Science Monitor)

January 2010 – New jobless claims rise unexpectedly (AP)

February 2010 – First-time jobless claims rise unexpectedly (AP)

April 2010 – Initial jobless claims increase unexpectedly (AP)

May 2010 – New jobless claims rise unexpectedly (AP)

June 2010 – “The number of Americans seeking jobless benefits last week unexpectedly rose to a one-month high, indicating firings are staying elevated even as the U.S. economy grows.” (Bloomberg)

July 2010 – Weekly jobless claims rise unexpectedly (The Hill)

August 2010 – Stocks drop as jobless claims rise unexpectedly (AP)

September 2010 – New Jobless Claims Rise Unexpectedly (AP)

October 2010 – US initial weekly jobless claims rise unexpectedly (International Business Times)

January 2011 – “U.S. jobless claims jumped unexpectedly last week to their highest level since October, suggesting the labor market is still in a rut despite signs of improvement in the economy.” (Reuters)

February 2011 – First-time jobless claims rise unexpectedly (AP)

April 2011 – Initial Jobless Claims Rise Unexpectedly (Reuters)

May 2011 - Jobless Claims Rise Unexpectedly (Bloomberg News)


As Expected, Jobless Claims “Unexpectedly” Increase » First Thoughts | A First Things Blog

[mlassoff]

But the tax burden of corporations and the high-income folks is at historical lows? Where's the hiring? The Republicans told me that the continuation of the Bush tax breaks for the highest brackets was necessary for job growth. Where's the growth?

[MrClose]

Originally Posted by mlassoff

But the tax burden of corporations and the high-income folks is at historical lows? Where's the hiring? The Republicans told me that the continuation of the Bush tax breaks for the highest brackets was necessary for job growth. Where's the growth?

There you go folks

The very first post brought Bush into the fray and on top of it .. had absolutely nothing to do with the subject.

Bush's Fault

[mlassoff]

Originally Posted by MrClose

There you go folks

The very first post brought Bush into the fray and on top of it .. had absolutely nothing to do with the subject.

Bush's Fault

Wow... How did you get that out of what I said!?!?! No wonder Fox viewers are so uninformed.

[MrClose]

Originally Posted by mlassoff

Wow... How did you get that out of what I said!?!?! No wonder Fox viewers are so uninformed.

W-e-l-l .. First you start out with 'The Republicans' and then you Had to make sure that Bush's name got thrown into it somewhere!

Not one word about how Expectedly .. the jobs numbers were Unexpected

Read Much?

[HappyTexan]

Originally Posted by mlassoff

But the tax burden of corporations and the high-income folks is at historical lows? Where's the hiring? The Republicans told me that the continuation of the Bush tax breaks for the highest brackets was necessary for job growth. Where's the growth?

Small business make up most of American jobs. Be worried about their tax burden and lack of expansion and not these multi-nationals that produce offshore nor rich Americans that don't directly hire people.

[Crossfire600]

Originally Posted by mlassoff

Wow... How did you get that out of what I said!?!?! No wonder Fox viewers are so uninformed.

You are joking right? Please God, tell me your joking.. You realize you, by no fault of your own it's an impulsive reaction among your people, threw Bush's name out there and deflected the OP's data by blaming Bush..

Now your blaming Fox News..

ROTFLMAO! Your kind makes me smile everyday!

[Frozenyo]

So what's the news here? Who were these "rises" unexpected to and who the hell cares that jobs didn't grow at the pace whoever expected them to. We've gained 2 million jobs since April 09 which is actually what matters not that jobless claims were higher than "expected". In many of those months they were actually down. Are you kidding me? "expected" LMAO..Try again.

I expect more out of every thread I open but what do I get? This foolishness.

[MrClose]

Originally Posted by Frozenyo

So what's the news here? Who were these "rises" unexpected to and who the hell cares that jobs didn't grow at the pace whoever expected them to. We've gained 2 million jobs since April 09 which is actually what matters not that jobless claims were higher than "expected". In many of those months they were actually down. Are you kidding me? "expected" LMAO..Try again.

I expect more out of every thread I open but what do I get? This foolishness.

Sad

Reading is fundamental .. Please try to do so.

[Frozenyo]

Originally Posted by MrClose

Sad

Reading is fundamental .. Please try to do so.

I comprehend very well. It's of absolutely no meaning. The only thing this shows is that the "expecters" are usually wrong. If that makes you feel good, have at it. What whomever "expects" does not change what is.