Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is also a lot easier, safer, and less expensive to make an 8 minute trip into low-orbit to resupply ISS than a few days to land where you want to land on the moon.
And if something goes awry, you can jump into the Soyuz docked there for the purpose, separate, de-orbit and be back. Of course, the ISS is also protected from solar flare radiation by the Van Allen belts. A moon base would need a lot of shielding. (By careful observation, you can predict major solar flares in advance (most of the time), and that was done for the Apollo missions. For long-duration stays, you must have a plan that lets you survive a flare.)
Well, if it wasn't a moon landing then it was a back lot at NASA Clear Lake which was terraformed to make like the moon, or some close representation. The country's biggest sand box.
Do you have anything useful to say about anything, ever?
"Useful"
Now THAT'S an interesting term.
Since the moon issue was launched by politicians as a national ego necessity . . .
Where have you gone, Joe DiMaggio?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.