Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-04-2017, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,607,170 times
Reputation: 29385

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1
So if a woman decides to keep her baby it's a life, but if she decides to have an abortion, it wasn't a life?

Whether you get it or not, there IS hypocrisy around this. You can't claim the fetus is not life in one instance and proclaim it is in another.

It's like when attorneys would blame women for being raped because of what they were wearing, yet a man would be arrested and charged if he decided to pay an undercover cop who approached him wearing the same type of attire.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clintone View Post
That's not hypocrisy. You're twisting things. You're trying to make the person you're talking about, the woman considering an abortion, look as dumb as possible, and it's misleading.
Only you would interpret it this way.

It's not the woman considering an abortion who looks dumb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-04-2017, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,352,196 times
Reputation: 2610
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
Well, that certainly is a slap in the face to every loving adoptive parent out there.
Okay, if it's ugly it'll probably result in the child having a less than ideal life. Better? If it's pretty, it could very well have a wonderful life due to parents who adopt it instantly...which would result in the ugly children having to wait longer for parents.

Quote:
How about people play God and take real control over life by using birth control when they don't want to get pregnant?

THAT is the escape.
That would be ideal, yes, but what about if contraception fails or you have a fetus with major abnormalities?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,352,196 times
Reputation: 2610
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
Only you would interpret it this way.

It's not the woman considering an abortion who looks dumb.
Some people might be personifying the fetus too much in some cases and not enough in others, but why only get annoyed at the people who personify it too little? It's not fair to get mad at them without getting annoyed at the people who personify it too much to the point where they believe any predecessor of an adult human has the same value as that adult human.

From what I understand, at 8 weeks pregnancy, the fetus is about half an inch long. This will not be a very complicated organism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2017, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Chicago area
18,757 posts, read 11,794,120 times
Reputation: 64156
So only liberals have abortions? Yeah right. This reeks of troll banter. Lets see. How many of those unwanted children are you and your fanatical pro life people willing to take? Five? Ten? What zero? Thought so. What about those who are non believers? Are we supposed to change our life to suit your one size must fit all fanaticism? What if Isis took over the world and we were all forced into sharia law? Would you like that? To be forced into a lifestyle you would not want because they believe that their way is the only way? Not so much fun when the shoe is on the other foot. Worry about your own life. Not what others choose to do with theirs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 11:16 AM
 
3 posts, read 1,721 times
Reputation: 10
Since a "mother?" has the "choice" of killing her baby, or not. then, a murderer should have the "choice" of killing his victim, also with the approval of that same kind of people! Obviously, these fools, who like to PRETEND a fetus is NOT a live baby, have never once SEEN the millions of tiny little live "fetuses", who are born prematurely, and kept alive in the neo-natal nurseries, for their parents and their futures. I wonder why THEIR mothers didn't abort these killers? We are not even brutal enough to kill fetal PUPPIES, in this country, yet we murder fetal HUMANS!! See what happens in a lawsuit if anyone EVER tries to abort a farmer's valuable calf fetus!! Course, THAT'S a valuable CALF! Humans are obviously worthless and dispensable, just like Hitler's murdering of the millions of Jews!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 11:27 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,008,400 times
Reputation: 15559
Age of viability I think would play in the legal decision to charge for murder of an unborn fetus. Right now the earliest limit is calculated at 22 weeks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 11:34 AM
 
13,586 posts, read 13,118,325 times
Reputation: 17786
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpsTN View Post
Fine. So, it is OK for YOU to kill your baby, but not for me to kill it. I contend it should be illegal for either of us to kill it. If the baby is alive before and after it is born, why are mother's procecuted for killing the baby after birth but not before. Are they MORE alive after birth?

Charles Sands
37129
It is physically attached to the mother, giving her governance of it. You can't remove / kill the fetus because it is not attached to you.

Babies gain individual personhood when they take their first breath on their own, outside the womb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 11:41 AM
 
8,886 posts, read 4,580,593 times
Reputation: 16242
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLVgal View Post
It is physically attached to the mother, giving her governance of it. You can't remove / kill the fetus because it is not attached to you.

Babies gain individual personhood when they take their first breath on their own, outside the womb.
As to your first statement, then why isn't someone charged with also murdering, oh, her kidneys and liver and etc? If the fetus isn't a person, how can you murder it and not all of those other things "physically attached to the mother"?

And as to your 2nd statement, that's your definition, and is not shared by a large number of folks. Your saying it is so does not make it so.

I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Formerly New England now Texas!
1,708 posts, read 1,099,244 times
Reputation: 1562
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpsTN View Post
why is death of pregnant woman two deaths but abortion not a death? (illegal, support)
Legislation is messy, but legislation via court is an abomination. The court has created a right, and has an interest in defending it's new creation. As such, abortion is very messy legally. If Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton were overturned by a conservative Supreme Court, states would decide as they did for most of our history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 12:26 PM
 
8,131 posts, read 4,327,299 times
Reputation: 4683
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpsTN View Post
Fine. So, it is OK for YOU to kill your baby, but not for me to kill it. I contend it should be illegal for either of us to kill it. If the baby is alive before and after it is born, why are mother's procecuted for killing the baby after birth but not before. Are they MORE alive after birth?

Charles Sands
37129


Abortions are legal. Unless you're carrying the fetus in your body, you have not argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top