Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm talking bottom line dollars- not per capita. Nice try though.
Actually, what you said was:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma
The U.S. provides more foreign aid than the rest of the countries in the world combined. Is this fair to the citizens of the U.S.?
We've seen that the US provides less foreign aid than the EU, and is barely ahead of some of the single countries (despite the much larger population).
It is quite clear that the US does not provide more aid than "the rest of the countries of the world together".
Per capita, the US donations are somewhat less than Ireland and Finland:
If we multiply this up by the total population, the US does squeak out a win, by a very tiny margin. As long as the EU is considered as separate countries, as a block the EU donates almost twice as much as the US.
Total economic and military assistance: $44.9 billion
Total military assistance: $11 billion
Total economic assistance: $33.9 billion of which,
USAID assistance: $11.7 billion
Private donations even exceed what is listed on that map:
Quote:
Aid from private sources in the U.S. in 2007 was probably somewhere in the 10 to 30 billion dollar range. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) estimated that net private grants from the U.S. to developing countries totaled $12.2 billion that year.[2] A private think-tank, the Hudson Institute, gave the following figures for U.S. private assistance for 2004:
Hudson Institute Data
U.S. Private Assistance: $24.2 billion
of which, contributions from:
Foundations: $3.4 billion
Private and Voluntary Organisations (eg., NGOs): $9.7 billion
Universities and Colleges: $1.7 billion
Religious Organizations: $4.5 billion
Corporations: $4.9 billion[3]
Then we can start on UN, the US contributes 22% of it's budget.
Is the U.S. really independent? (Oil dependency + Biggest debtor nation)
You realize the US has a vast amount of untapped resources? We're easily the most independent nation where potential is concerned. We could for example meet power and diesel needs with coal alone for the next century. Diesel derived from coal comes in around a $40 or $50 barrel and with more than 1/4 of the worlds know coal reserves it's vast resource.
There is other resources like the trillion barrels, that's trillion with a T, in the Green river formation.
These resources are not exploited because of the volatile oil market but as prices rise and stabilize at higher amounts they will come into play.
Here's a question for you, what is Venezuela going to do to support the economy when they have no oil left? Will there be rioting in the streets when people have to pay more than a few cents for gallon of gasoline? You're country is walking a tight rope and when the oil runs out your toast.
The more you look at it the more likely it looks like one of the worst case scenarios are likely to happen. That report isn't factoring in the massive amount of money Obama has inflicted upon this nation either. I'm sure that he saw a much more detailed report than this so why he picked the path to an even worse position globally is beyond me.
But then again he did say he wanted to "fundamentally transform America" and that he wanted to be a transformational president.
Last edited by BigJon3475; 07-07-2011 at 06:36 AM..
that is the funded debt. if you add in the unfunded debt that number is well over $100,000,000,000,000.00 or over $100 trillion. that number will never be paid off thanks to both the democrats and republicans.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.