Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He had addiction to pain killers years ago. No different than what many other people have done. He is not currently an addict. So your statements are incorrect and frankly, are typical of what I'd expect.
As for Casey Anthony goes? I bet you think OJ was innocent, too? And that he was actually on those golf courses looking for his ex's killer?
<<He is not currently an addict>>>
Calvinist, you apparently don't know what "addict" means.
Refute what? A just acquitted the lady as they said they couldn't prove that it was even a homicide. There's nothing to refute.
I'm stating facts. He's a recovering drug addict. I remember him whining about marijuana of all things in the 90's and then he goes on to abuse pills. Stating the truth is not slander.
No, he's lying, as usual. Very skillfully, also as usual.
Limbaugh is exploiting the emotionalism surrounding the tragic death of a child to make an invalid, false argument that the killing of little Caylee is morally equivalent to abortion. He is also taking a side-swipe at liberals too, saying they are hypocrites for condemning Caylee's death.
Limbaugh is using a dead two year old to make cheap, hurtful, invalid political points and profit from the noteriety- he knows if he is outrageous enough, he'll get publicity outside his circle of listeners.
Disgusting, but about what you'd expect from him.
It's not a matter of when life begins, it's a matter of when love begins.
According to liberals, there is no love for a fetus. Therefore killing Fetus Caylee is different than killing Baby Caylee.
If Casey Anthony had aborted this child, you wouldn't have known about it, nor would you have cared. But you sure would have championed her right to do it.
But killing her? Oh, well, that's a different story. Right?
So, tell me, where is Limbaugh wrong?
Limbaugh has gut punched liberals and robbed all the oxygen from their windpipes with this one. And he's right.
It's not a matter of when life begins, it's a matter of when love begins.
According to liberals, there is no love for a fetus. Therefore killing Fetus Caylee is different than killing Baby Caylee.
If Casey Anthony had aborted this child, you wouldn't have known about it, nor would you have cared. But you sure would have championed her right to do it.
But killing her? Oh, well, that's a different story. Right?
So, tell me, where is Limbaugh wrong?
Limbaugh has gut punched liberals and robbed all the oxygen from their windpipes with this one. And he's right.
Limbaugh is wrong because abortion is not murder. Not factually and not legally.
Murder is the unlawful taking of a human life with malice (callous, deliberate intent to harm). Abortion is the legal termination of a potential human life (pregnancy). No malice is involved.
If you want, you can argue that YOU believe abortion is murder. Some people feel that way. But it is an extremist, minority point of view. To be logically consistent, you'd have to also believe that the shooting of Dr Teller in Kansas was justifiable homicide. Do you?
Limbaugh is also "wrong" to deliberately exploit the death of an innocent child to make cheap, sensational political points. He is intellegent enough to know exactly what he's doing, too. Now THAT'S malice.
He had addiction to pain killers years ago. No different than what many other people have done. He is not currently an addict. So your statements are incorrect and frankly, are typical of what I'd expect.
As for Casey Anthony goes? I bet you think OJ was innocent, too? And that he was actually on those golf courses looking for his ex's killer?
Rush will be an addict for the rest of his life. There is no cure for addiction.
Limbaugh is wrong because abortion is not murder. Not factually and not legally.
Murder is the unlawful taking of a human life with malice (callous, deliberate intent to harm). Abortion is the legal termination of a potential human life (pregnancy). No malice is involved.
If you want, you can argue that YOU believe abortion is murder. Some people feel that way. But it is an extremist, minority point of view. To be logically consistent, you'd have to also believe that the shooting of Dr Teller in Kansas was justifiable homicide. Do you?
Limbaugh is also "wrong" to deliberately exploit the death of an innocent child to make cheap, sensational political points. He is intellegent enough to know exactly what he's doing, too. Now THAT'S malice.
"No malice involved."
Tell that to the baby. I'm sure she'll feel much better about it.
I guess making crude, snide, sniping comments about Limbaugh is a sight easier than refuting his arguments.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
