U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-09-2011, 01:08 AM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,096 posts, read 21,734,413 times
Reputation: 7932

Advertisements

Foxnews is reporting that because of the bad economy the navy has a surplus of sailors and will begin the process of seeing who to eliminate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-09-2011, 01:18 AM
 
Location: California
28,850 posts, read 29,476,709 times
Reputation: 23673
Link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2011, 01:20 AM
 
Location: USA
2,515 posts, read 3,171,053 times
Reputation: 2099
That's not good, the military is just about the only entity out there who's been hiring lately.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2011, 01:22 AM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
11,670 posts, read 9,052,080 times
Reputation: 10211
This should be greeted as great news on this forum!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2011, 02:16 AM
 
23,852 posts, read 17,811,778 times
Reputation: 9359
I may be in the minority, but I see this as a good thing. The military has been stretched thin in the War On Terror, but part of that has to do with fewer soldiers/marines/sailors/airmen electing to sign-up for combat related duties, and instead taking the more "administrative" route that keeps them out of harms way.

In my three trips to Iraq, i've seen what I consider to be a top heavy Administrative Army. Not to denigrate those that serve, but most American's would be surprised at the number of military folks sitting behind a desk versus shooting a gun. Yes, these folks are needed, but the ranks are bloated with these servicemembers from my perspective.

I believe a strategic reduction in non-combat roles is needed while simultaneously increasing the number of combat operators.

As for the Navy, I can't speak specifically to this troop reduction, but if its anything like what i've witnessed in ground forces, i'd say its good to reduce the force there as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2011, 03:28 AM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,440 posts, read 28,750,785 times
Reputation: 15560
OMG, Marines on the loose????
Lock up your women!!!!
Ooorah!
(Wife of a Marine)
Seriously, link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2011, 04:16 AM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,096 posts, read 21,734,413 times
Reputation: 7932
Navy to Cut Jobs Amid Recession-Driven Sailor Surplus - FoxNews.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2011, 06:19 AM
 
23,356 posts, read 12,776,756 times
Reputation: 11059
America has way too many millitary personel, but 3,000 is not nearly enough. Keep hacking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2011, 06:25 AM
 
7,965 posts, read 10,096,145 times
Reputation: 4073
Since I work for the Navy, we get these newsbites regularly and this came out to us about a month ago; however, the story I read didn't state that it had anything to do with the economy at all but just that they had a surplus of personnel and, really, not much to do with them.

I think "due to the economy" many people who would have otherwise never signed up for the military have, and I do feel bad if someone gets kicked out of the military unprepared. But the paring down of troops has to do with required numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2011, 06:44 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,244 posts, read 13,606,787 times
Reputation: 4574
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
I may be in the minority, but I see this as a good thing. The military has been stretched thin in the War On Terror, but part of that has to do with fewer soldiers/marines/sailors/airmen electing to sign-up for combat related duties, and instead taking the more "administrative" route that keeps them out of harms way.

In my three trips to Iraq, i've seen what I consider to be a top heavy Administrative Army. Not to denigrate those that serve, but most American's would be surprised at the number of military folks sitting behind a desk versus shooting a gun. Yes, these folks are needed, but the ranks are bloated with these servicemembers from my perspective.

I believe a strategic reduction in non-combat roles is needed while simultaneously increasing the number of combat operators.

As for the Navy, I can't speak specifically to this troop reduction, but if its anything like what i've witnessed in ground forces, i'd say its good to reduce the force there as well.
But, but, you apply knowledge, understanding and reason. That is totally uncalled for here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:10 PM.

© 2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top