Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The social conservative group "Family Leader" has apologized for the section in it's candidate pledge that refers to black families being healthier under slavery. No indication they changed their minds about gays being disease-riddled degenerates, though.
So, when can we expect candidate Bachmann to apologize for signing the damn thing? Not right away, it seems. So far, her campaign is sticking to the unlikely story that the copy she signed didn't have the slavery reference in it(in spite of all evidence to the contrary- the slavery reference is the first bullet point in the preamble).
We'll see how long Bachmann's BS stands up. I'm predicting a full recant by Bachmann within 48 hrs.
Hopefully, it will be to little-too late to save her misbegotten campaign.
The social conservative group "Family Leader" has apologized for the section in it's candidate pledge that refers to black families being healthier under slavery. No indication they changed their minds about gays being disease-riddled degenerates, though.
So, when can we expect candidate Bachmann to apologize for signing the damn thing? Not right away, it seems. So far, her campaign is sticking to the unlikely story that the copy she signed didn't have the slavery reference in it(in spite of all evidence to the contrary- the slavery reference is the first bullet point in the preamble).
We'll see how long Bachmann's BS stands up. I'm predicting a full recant by Bachmann within 48 hrs.
Hopefully, it will be to little-too late to save her misbegotten campaign.
Why would Bachmann back down on her views on gay people? Her family business makes too much money from scamming self-loathing gay people into believing they can "pray-away-the-gay".
The social conservative group "Family Leader" has apologized for the section in it's candidate pledge that refers to black families being healthier under slavery. No indication they changed their minds about gays being disease-riddled degenerates, though.
So, when can we expect candidate Bachmann to apologize for signing the damn thing? Not right away, it seems. So far, her campaign is sticking to the unlikely story that the copy she signed didn't have the slavery reference in it(in spite of all evidence to the contrary- the slavery reference is the first bullet point in the preamble).
We'll see how long Bachmann's BS stands up. I'm predicting a full recant by Bachmann within 48 hrs.
Hopefully, it will be to little-too late to save her misbegotten campaign.
Bachmann is a nut job, and the whole world already knows it. It's pretty damn sad when we are suppose to decide between crappy candidates like her and Obama. I just won't vote!!!!!
Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household* than was an African American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American President.
Early Saturday, Bachmann's spokeswoman Alice Stewart said that the she had only endorsed the 14-point “candidate vow,” which did not include the slavery passage. (Which is totally retarded spin.)
*************************
It's the first bullet point of the document. So let's face facts.
A.They either can't read and comprehend English.
B. They didn't read what they signed.
C. They actually agreed it was quite awesome for slave families way back in the good ol' times of slavery.
Any choice is epic fail.
When's the last time you thought of a slave plantation as a "household".
Would the ship that carried them over have been a "temporary household?"
The more you think about what was said, the more stupid it becomes.
Slaves were not allowed to marry legally, but they almost always celebrated their union with a ceremony. Many prefered religious services - as many as two-fifths of the Episcopalian weddings in the Confederate states in the year before the war involved slaves. But the ministers never said "what God has joined together, let no man put asunder". The white owner could sunder a marriage with the wave of a pen, and in the eyes of the law, slaves could no more marry than they could go to court, own property, or control their children's fate. How were the family life of African slaves? - Yahoo! Answers
Apparently neither one of them can read. Obviously, they're not qualified to be POTUS.
As if anybody REALLY needed this latest dustup to realize that?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bachmann and Santorum back away from pledge slavery fiasco; claim inability to understand the written word.
