Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-11-2011, 10:58 AM
 
2,794 posts, read 4,155,693 times
Reputation: 1563

Advertisements

Palin's white hood is slippin again. Does anyone actually believe she would have used the term "Sugar Daddy" with a white man?? What a *****.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-11-2011, 11:00 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,615,778 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by ray1945 View Post
You seriously believe that mess we are in is solely the fault of "liberal" policies?
I do.

Including the liberal policies that George Bush used. It goes back a long way. But Skippy heaped on not just the straw that broke the back, but the rest of the bale along with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2011, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,644 posts, read 26,371,773 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
As opposed to NeoConfused policies?

SPEND!

SPEND!

SPEND!

With NO concern for how that spending will be paid for?

Htpocrites that they are, like Bachmann whining about government spending while praising the Secretary of Agriculture FOR government spending?


2007 was the last year a Republican Congress was able to slow down Pelosi and pals.

That year, and in constant 2005 dollars, the US federal government spent a grand total (including both wars) of $2,565,100,000,000. This year Democrats will spend 30% more or $3,341,300,000,000.

Spending increased under Republicans as well. From 1998 to 2007 spending also increased 30%, but that took nine years.

The annual deficit which stood at $151,000,000,000 in 2007 has been increased by 953% under Democrats.

Did you call someone confused?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2011, 11:12 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,646,362 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savoir Faire View Post
Why are liberals so obsessed with Sarah Palin that they must create these threads?

They must be so afraid of her that they have a need to create a thread every time she says something.

This thread is another example of liberal obsession with Palin. Leave her alone, all she wants is privacy and to be left in peace.
You are kidding, right?

Almost all threads regarding palin (and bachmann) are started by their fans.

I suppose your last paragraph makes your post satire
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2011, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,934,056 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
No mention of what the woman said, just more deflection completed by the favorite dirty name of the left, hypocrite.
Nope just stated the truth, something you have never been good at dealing with, hence your childish attempt at an insult.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2011, 11:35 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,646,362 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
More left wing crap about Fox. It is hard and just a bit scary, i would think, for you people to believe that Fox actually does tell the truth. What is your favorite source of TV news? LSDNBC?
Does Fox News make an announcement or something, saying that the 'following is true', and then recite the news story?

And then, when they are just being 'entertainment', do they make a similar announcement so the viewers are informed of what is 'news' and what is 'entertainment'?

No, didn't think so...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2011, 11:38 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,739,641 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
How right she is. With the abysmal failure of obama's stimulus, the tap has run dry, the chickens have come home to roost and the out of control spending we have seen for the last 4 years is crippling this country.

The Sugar Daddy Has Run Out of Sugar; Now We Need New Leaders | Facebook



She references Thatcher who was spot on - they have run out of other people's money to spend, but still they want more.

Let this be a lesson to the American people - liberal policies (tax, spend, tax some more) WILL lead you on the path to ruin. We see across the globe and across this nation.
That's the good thing about not being in charge. You can say anything without having to deliver
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2011, 12:01 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
2007 was the last year a Republican Congress was able to slow down Pelosi and pals.

That year, and in constant 2005 dollars, the US federal government spent a grand total (including both wars) of $2,565,100,000,000. This year Democrats will spend 30% more or $3,341,300,000,000.

Spending increased under Republicans as well. From 1998 to 2007 spending also increased 30%, but that took nine years.

The annual deficit which stood at $151,000,000,000 in 2007 has been increased by 953% under Democrats.

Did you call someone confused?
Confused? You Bet!

Conservatives talk the "less government, less spending" talk but are as hopeslessly inept as anyone else in walking thw walk. The righties champion St Ronnie as such a hero of conservatism. Please do tell just how much he shrank government during his tenure? The conservative "less spending" is a load of crap, the truth is they favor less spending except when it affects them personally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top