Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"Justice spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa said the anti-discrimination notice "does not compel the banks to make loans to people who do not qualify." She said such measures are "essential to remedy the harmful effects of the banks' conduct."
I tell you what, you guys are funny. How about you read the entire article? The more emoticons doesn't make your nonsense factual.
Cheers!!
Lol, the government that regulates them, simply sues them. No that isn't intimidation.
Read my above post. This is a provocative article about absolutely nothing. That's why the saved the most important statement for the end. By then righties are already rushing to get it up on forums and spread the venum.
Explain to me how this woman's quote somehow makes everything else in the article null and void?
frozenyo is right that ibd does lean right, and therefore should probably not be taken at face value.
More silliness. If it is biased, it should be easy to debunk. I refute Daily Kos regularly, and easily. And I never need to mention their bias. Have at it.
If it's so biased, why would they include a quote that according to some people in this thread invalidates the rest of the article?
Because they have to to maintain any crediblity. Thanks for admitting the only factual statement in the article (at the very end) invalidates the rest of the mongering.
Of course you have no answer for the OFFICIAL DOJ statement not a bunch of fearmongering in a conservative rag.
Cheers!! (I got two exclamation points.)
I'm pretty sure I just explained it to you, DOJ is trying to intimidate the banks. Why do they want them to relax the standards, in light of the situation we are in today? It makes zero sense.
Again you simply can't refute the fact that DOJ wants banks to lower lending standards, it is simply foolish. But what do you expect out of Mr. 9.2%?
Because they have to to maintain any crediblity. Thanks for admitting the only factual statement in the article (at the very end) invalidates the rest of the mongering.
So in order to remain credible, they add a quote that destroys their credibility by disproving the entire article. Brilliant.
Ah, the very thing that brought on the housing crisis. What's the definition of insanity again?
Why doesn't Obama just use his left over stimulus money to buy houses then let minorities take them over with a lease/option to buy.
Yeah, yeah... I know, it's not Obama's money but he doesn't know that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
