Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-24-2011, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,163,062 times
Reputation: 21738

Advertisements

Here you go:

Quote:
'Super Congress': Debt Ceiling Negotiators Aim To Create New Legislative Body

This "Super Congress," composed of members of both chambers and both parties, isn't mentioned anywhere in the Constitution, but would be granted extraordinary new powers. Under a plan put forth by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his counterpart Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), legislation to lift the debt ceiling would be accompanied by the creation of a 12-member panel made up of 12 lawmakers -- six from each chamber and six from each party.

Legislation approved by the Super Congress -- which some on Capitol Hill are calling the "super committee" -- would then be fast-tracked through both chambers, where it couldn't be amended by simple, regular lawmakers, who'd have the ability only to cast an up or down vote. With the weight of both leaderships behind it, a product originated by the Super Congress would have a strong chance of moving through the little Congress and quickly becoming law. A Super Congress would be less accountable than the system that exists today, and would find it easier to strip the public of popular benefits. Negotiators are currently considering cutting the mortgage deduction and tax credits for retirement savings, for instance, extremely popular policies that would be difficult to slice up using the traditional legislative process.
'Super Congress': Debt Ceiling Negotiators Aim To Create New Legislative Body

Once that's in place, all you need a super-crisis so Americans throw away all of their rights to be "saved."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2011, 09:37 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,930,375 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Here you go:



'Super Congress': Debt Ceiling Negotiators Aim To Create New Legislative Body

Once that's in place, all you need a super-crisis so Americans throw away all of their rights to be "saved."
No wonder Obama is behind this plan. It is a Marxist's dream.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2011, 09:45 PM
 
2,635 posts, read 3,511,205 times
Reputation: 1686
It's the same concept behind fast-track approval for international treaties and bilateral agreements. Congress can still vote down proposed legislation, something it has done in the past. Sorry to pop your conspiracy bubble.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2011, 09:46 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
It's the same concept behind fast-track approval for international treaties and bilateral agreements. Congress can still vote down proposed legislation, something it has done in the past. Sorry to pop your conspiracy bubble.
Yep, no different than the other dozens of Committees Congress has currently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2011, 09:47 PM
 
760 posts, read 685,545 times
Reputation: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
It's the same concept behind fast-track approval for international treaties and bilateral agreements. Congress can still vote down proposed legislation, something it has done in the past. Sorry to pop your conspiracy bubble.
Don't kill their fun so fast! Let them run around in circles for a bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2011, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,163,062 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
No wonder Obama is behind this plan. It is a Marxist's dream.
You have wonder if Geitner hasn't been playing both sides.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
It's the same concept behind fast-track approval for international treaties and bilateral agreements. Congress can still vote down proposed legislation, something it has done in the past. Sorry to pop your conspiracy bubble.
You have no clue what you are talking about. It is not the same thing, and it is not in the Constitution. Maybe you didn't read the article:

Quote:
Legislation approved by the Super Congress -- which some on Capitol Hill are calling the "super committee" -- would then be fast-tracked through both chambers, where it couldn't be amended by simple, regular lawmakers, who'd have the ability only to cast an up or down vote
If we look at other "fast-track" committees in Congress, we can see major differences:

Quote:
Fast-track procedures often include some or all of the following elements:
• a definition of the kinds of bills or resolutions to which the expedited procedures are to apply;
• mandatory introduction of such a measure, often promptly after the House and Senate receive a message that the President is required to submit;
• a requirement for the committee to which the measure is referred to report it within a certain number of days;
• provision for automatic discharge of a committee, or for a privileged motion to discharge, if the measure is not reported within a specified time;
• privileged access for the measure to the House and Senate floor for
consideration;
• limitations on the length of time that each house can debate or consider the measure on the floor;
• prohibitions against Members proposing floor amendments to the measure and offering certain other motions during its consideration; and
• automatic “hookup†procedures that ensure prompt floor action in either house on any companion bill or resolution that the other house has passed.
Clearly the purpose of previous "fast-tracked" legislation was to get it to the floor for a vote, and to prevent it from being blocked or delayed by procedural obstacles, which is what prevents 9 out of 10 bills from every being acted upon.

The Super Congress wants to put a bill before a vote without any debate, and without any scrutiny, because they've "already debated it."

That basically renders your elected representatives irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2011, 10:10 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,264,475 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Here you go:



'Super Congress': Debt Ceiling Negotiators Aim To Create New Legislative Body

Once that's in place, all you need a super-crisis so Americans throw away all of their rights to be "saved."
Your article is pretty scary if you think about this happening. Obviously it is unconstitutional and since we know about it so soon it should never happen. I doubt that my Representative in the House will go along with this kind thing even if he gets to be one of the 12. That can't happen since he is one of the new ones that is being accused of being a Tea Partier.

Did you notice that the article says only the two parties will be allowed to hav members on the "Super Congress"? That appears to be a way to shut out the Tea Party and surely the GOP won't attempt something like that.

My answer is that it is so unconstitutional that it just can't happen. Yes, allowing only the few Congressmen to tae part these last few days points that direction but I can't believe that the others are ready to become irrelevant to 12 other Congressers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2011, 10:12 PM
 
Location: The middle of nowhere Arkansas
3,325 posts, read 3,170,019 times
Reputation: 1015
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Yep, no different than the other dozens of Committees Congress has currently.

In other words completely worthless and pointless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2011, 10:15 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,442,508 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air Force View Post
Don't kill their fun so fast! Let them run around in circles for a bit.

What? i think these bozos want us Americans running around in circles, and circles, and circles. Either that or are heads can explode, from all the bull we are being told.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2011, 01:16 AM
 
Location: Chesterfield,Virginia
4,919 posts, read 4,834,229 times
Reputation: 2659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air Force View Post
Don't kill their fun so fast! Let them run around in circles for a bit.
Did Mircea put a damper on your celebration?

Like the majority of Libbies who either can't or wont first READ what they are making fun of .. It's fairly easy to P!$$ on y'alls party!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top