Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, it's not. You will not die if you don't have sex. I know you may not believe it but it truly is not the same as telling a creature not to eat to survive.
Are you seriously comparing the American culture to those in Africa? REALLY?!!?
Culture? Both continents are inhabited by human beings who have natural desire to have sex (much like eating), and they will do it with, or without contraceptives, and it has nothing to do with 'incentives'.
They don't have incentives in Africa, Asia and South America, and they still have way too many babies. Who told you people have babies because of incentives? That is a weird argument with nothing to back it up. Do you really think the government hands people everything they need? No, they are handed barely enough to survive, and they live in misery.
I didn't ask a question, I made a statement, hence the period.
I still don't understand how people can rail against paying for other people's health care in one breath, and write a check to an insurance company in the next.
I went back and reread your statement and sure enough it is a statement. A questionable one, but a statement nevertheless. Sorry, I don't always understand progspeak.
Yeah, thats a real solution, and one thats likely to happen.
Telling people to abstain always works.
You just reminded me of one of the funniest things I have ever seen. Many years ago, about 3 months before my first marriage my wife to be was talking with a group of other young women (all married) about how inconvenient pregnancy before marriage was and they asked her what her secret was. She just replied that we used a fool proof method and she got all kinds of questions about that, of course. Her answer was one word, "Abstinence" That is the part of Bush's program that I always believed in.
"Generic versions of the pill are available for as little as $9 a month. Still, about half of all pregnancies are unplanned.Many are among women using some form of contraception, and forgetting to take the pill is a major reason."
This is insanity. I DO NOT want to pay for YOUR birth control! Especially if you and millions of others, do NOT then use the BC the proper way and STILL get pregnant! Plus, imagine how many STD's will now be diagnosed....with the presumed decrease in condom use! Lovely! You and I will be paying for the AIDS/STD treatments that will follow the free birth control pills!!!!
And, if one cannot afford the $9 generic pills...then they have NO right to be risking becoming pregnant as they surely CANNOT AFFORD A CHILD which requires care in amts way greater than $9/month!
Obamacare is A FARCE. There is NO way the premiums will be affordable to everyday citizens with all this carp that is being given out free in the nanny-state Obama has created.
I agree with everything you said. I think that AIDS cases will skyrocket due to decrease condom use. I mean, why would a person use a condom when they can get free birth control? Lazy people will no longer pay for $3.00 condoms when the taxpayers are giving them free birth control.
For those women who can't keep their legs crossed? The sluts deserve nothing for free.
LMFAO. If they didn't 'uncross their legs' and weren't 'sluts' some people would have nothing to blather about. Maybe the vitriol comes from personal experience.
I agree with everything you said. I think that AIDS cases will skyrocket due to decrease condom use. I mean, why would a person use a condom when they can get free birth control? Lazy people will no longer pay for $3.00 condoms when the taxpayers are giving them free birth control.
They are kind of mutually exclusive, for the same person. Maybe women want to take personal responsibility instead of hoping the guy is packing a condom when he initiates the sex.
I went back and reread your statement and sure enough it is a statement. A questionable one, but a statement nevertheless. Sorry, I don't always understand progspeak.
I've read enough of your posts to propose that your need to fit the world into little boxes such as 'progspeak' is due to a lack of ability to understand.
Is it, or is it not true, that the entire idea behind insurance is people paying for other people's health care?
yup...aids will increase, births will decrease, population goes down...mmmm
Quote:
Originally Posted by redroses777
I agree with everything you said. I think that AIDS cases will skyrocket due to decrease condom use. I mean, why would a person use a condom when they can get free birth control? Lazy people will no longer pay for $3.00 condoms when the taxpayers are giving them free birth control.
Or is that the plan?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
yup...aids will increase, births will decrease, population goes down...mmmm
