Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-11-2011, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,444,835 times
Reputation: 4777

Advertisements

Well as usual, the tea party types denounce stimulus but are first in line to pick up the check (and credit for creating jobs) back home. Bachman is no exception and her hypocrisy in regards to government handouts, along side her husband, is stunning to say the least.

Thanks to the freedom of information act we find that:

Quote:
On at least 16 separate occasions, Bachmann petitioned the federal government for direct financial help or aid. A large chunk of those requests were for funds set aside through President Obama's stimulus program, which Bachmann once labeled "fantasy economics." Bachmann made two more of those requests to the Environmental Protection Agency, an institution that she has suggested she would eliminate if she were in the White House.
Of course lets not forget her federally subsidized home loan as well as her physician husband, a Ted Haggard doppelganger, who receives Medicaid payments (for all you Tea Party members, Medicaid is a government program in case you were still unaware.)

As it turns out, while Bachman was calling Obama's stimulus "an orgy of spending" she was also requesting money-and lots of it-back home.

Worse yet, is Bachman's hypocrisy in regards to the EPA. These days she refers to them as "job killing organization of America." However it wasn't long ago that Mrs. Bachman was writing the EPA herself urging funding for her projects back home:

Quote:
Bachmann co-signed a letter to the EPA urging its officials to help fund technical assistance programs and rural water initiatives "in small communities across Minnesota." The authors of the letter, which included nearly the entire Minnesota congressional delegation at the time, noted that FY 2006 funding for the National Rural Water Association had been set at $11 million.
As it turns out, Bachman in her lust for federal funds, even wrote the wrong agency seeking money for the local police department. How embarrassing and what a complete and utter hypocrite.

More:

Michele Bachmann Repeatedly Sought Stimulus, EPA, Other Government Funds
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2011, 12:36 PM
 
11,531 posts, read 10,273,857 times
Reputation: 3580
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCPUNK View Post
Well as usual, the tea party types denounce stimulus but are first in line to pick up the check (and credit for creating jobs) back home. Bachman is no exception and her hypocrisy in regards to government handouts, along side her husband, is stunning to say the least.

Thanks to the freedom of information act we find that:



Of course lets not forget her federally subsidized home loan as well as her physician husband, a Ted Haggard doppelganger, who receives Medicaid payments (for all you Tea Party members, Medicaid is a government program in case you were still unaware.)

As it turns out, while Bachman was calling Obama's stimulus "an orgy of spending" she was also requesting money-and lots of it-back home.

Worse yet, is Bachman's hypocrisy in regards to the EPA. These days she refers to them as "job killing organization of America." However it wasn't long ago that Mrs. Bachman was writing the EPA herself urging funding for her projects back home:



As it turns out, Bachman in her lust for federal funds, even wrote the wrong agency seeking money for the local police department. How embarrassing and what a complete and utter hypocrite.

More:

Michele Bachmann Repeatedly Sought Stimulus, EPA, Other Government Funds
Tea party motto is do as I say and not as I do. Teabaggers will respond by saying

"Uh, she has every right to participate in government programs, uh, uh, yup, uh, don't tread on me"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2011, 12:53 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,083,971 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCPUNK View Post
Well as usual, the tea party types denounce stimulus but are first in line to pick up the check (and credit for creating jobs) back home. Bachman is no exception and her hypocrisy in regards to government handouts, along side her husband, is stunning to say the least.

Thanks to the freedom of information act we find that:



Of course lets not forget her federally subsidized home loan as well as her physician husband, a Ted Haggard doppelganger, who receives Medicaid payments (for all you Tea Party members, Medicaid is a government program in case you were still unaware.)

As it turns out, while Bachman was calling Obama's stimulus "an orgy of spending" she was also requesting money-and lots of it-back home.

Worse yet, is Bachman's hypocrisy in regards to the EPA. These days she refers to them as "job killing organization of America." However it wasn't long ago that Mrs. Bachman was writing the EPA herself urging funding for her projects back home:



As it turns out, Bachman in her lust for federal funds, even wrote the wrong agency seeking money for the local police department. How embarrassing and what a complete and utter hypocrite.

More:

Michele Bachmann Repeatedly Sought Stimulus, EPA, Other Government Funds
Steve Benen: How About a Bachmann-Inspired Stimulus?

Rachel Maddow talked to Steve Benen about his recent article at The Washington Monthly where he asked this after noting the Republicans like Michele Bachmann's hypocrisy of privately requesting stimulus funds for their districts while publicly decrying any further attempts to stimulate the economy and claiming it doesn't work.

Steve Benen: How About a Bachmann-Inspired Stimulus? | Video Cafe
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2011, 12:55 PM
 
25,024 posts, read 27,874,201 times
Reputation: 11790
Add to that fact that the tea partiers trust an IRS tax attorney (former or not, fact remains she was a lawyer working for the IRS) to be their face. Talk about an oxymoron
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2011, 12:57 PM
 
88 posts, read 132,106 times
Reputation: 50
Wait, another politician who can't be trusted?

Look, just because she has support of some people out there, don't make her out to be the Tea Party Pariah. The media drums up as much of this as they can, but when it comes down to it, nobody with a brain should be supporting this woman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2011, 01:06 PM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,674,125 times
Reputation: 1962
lol Ron Paul 2012
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2011, 01:10 PM
 
2,472 posts, read 3,192,140 times
Reputation: 2268
No one should be surprised.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2011, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Maine
7,727 posts, read 12,355,764 times
Reputation: 8344
Earmarks, pardons and farm subsidies. Medicaid payments, federal mortgage loan. Whackadoo......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2011, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,444,835 times
Reputation: 4777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savoir Faire View Post
Tea party motto is do as I say and not as I do. Teabaggers will respond by saying

"Uh, she has every right to participate in government programs, uh, uh, yup, uh, don't tread on me"
Notice how quiet they are all of a sudden. Wonder why that is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2011, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,856 posts, read 8,181,243 times
Reputation: 4590
The question is, can a person be opposed to government programs, in which they are the beneficiary of?


If the federal government is handing out a couple trillion dollars in a "stimulus", that will most likely be paid for either by taxes or through inflation of the US dollar(paid for just as much by Minnesotans as anyone else). I don't see how it is unprincipled to not attempt to bring as much of that money(that also came from your constituents) back into your district as possible.


I think it would be stupid for Bachmann to snub her nose at billions of dollars that rightfully belong to the people of her state. And anyone who thinks she is a hypocrite is a complete idiot.


I mean, if I am receiving social security, does that mean I can no longer support privatizing Social Security? Is it possible to work for the IRS, while supporting the abolishment of the income tax?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top