Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-22-2011, 07:48 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
Lets review...again for Historian guy...

Chief Justice Waite....(Minor)

At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

IT WAS NEVER DOUBTED


Hate to break the hearts of the Obama supporters....but he is not a natural born citizen according to Chief Justice Waite and very very doubtful he is a citizen under the 14th Amendment and WKA.

Take a few moments..digest this...then give me your thoughts...we are here to help you all through this.
The Minor case is irrelevant to citizenship. The Wong case is en pointe, you simply don't read it correctly. Obama was born in Hawaii. His parentage is irrelevant. He was born in the United States and is therefore a natural-born citizen of the United States.

Now, if you don't like it, write to your legislative representatives to get the laws changed. But nothing you do at this point will change the law as it stood when Obama was born, born in the USA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2011, 08:17 AM
 
1,574 posts, read 1,018,589 times
Reputation: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
Ask yourself that question.
lol

this is like the definition of trolling. You aren't going to debate or discus any facts, you're just going to repeat the same debunked "argument" based on a single out-of-context quote from an obscure court case that nobody who actually knows anything about law ever cites and then just accuse anyone who disagrees with you to be engaging in "deception." HURRRRRRRRR DURRRRRR


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2011, 03:49 AM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,825,085 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Vattel never mentioned natural born citizenship once.
The US Supreme Court said he did...


Justice Daniel...


"Thus Vattel, in the preliminary chapter to his Treatise on the Law of Nations, says:.....

"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority; they equally participate in its advantages.

The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As society cannot perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their parents, and succeed to all their rights."

Again: "I say, to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen; for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners who are permitted to settle and stay in the country." (Vattel, Book 1, cap. 19, p. 101.)

Justice Peter Daniel Dred Scottl - Google Scholar
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2011, 04:39 AM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,825,085 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
The Minor case is irrelevant to citizenship. The Wong case is en pointe, you simply don't read it correctly. Obama was born in Hawaii. His parentage is irrelevant. He was born in the United States and is therefore a natural-born citizen of the United States.

Now, if you don't like it, write to your legislative representatives to get the laws changed. But nothing you do at this point will change the law as it stood when Obama was born, born in the USA.

Nonsense. Wong was affirmed a citizen not.... a natural born citizen. His parents were permanent residents at his birth. This is in the decision.

Obama's father was not a permanent resident.

Thanks for playing.

Last edited by DraggingCanoe; 08-23-2011 at 04:57 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2011, 04:41 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,191,594 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by vamos View Post
Looks like Arizona should officially join the United States of Idiots.

why not, california, mass, ny, nj and washington dc already are there in the land of idiots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2011, 05:41 AM
 
Location: USA - midwest
5,944 posts, read 5,581,700 times
Reputation: 2606
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
"At the request of tea party leaders in Arizona, famed Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has promised to investigate the validity of Barack Obama's purported long-form birth certificate in a determination of the president's eligibility for the county's 2012 election ballot."

A county sheriff only answers to the people..not the Congress..not the President..not the Justice Department..not the Obamatrons...the people.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio to Investigate Validity of Obama's Birth Certificate | Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records

"No amount of evidence will ever convince an idiot."

Mark Twain

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2011, 07:34 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
Nonsense. Wong was affirmed a citizen not.... a natural born citizen. His parents were permanent residents at his birth. This is in the decision.

Obama's father was not a permanent resident.

Thanks for playing.
So, what you are telling us is that you don't care about American citizenship laws at all.

I repeat, there are only TWO kinds of American citizenship, the kind you are BORN with (hence natural-born citizenship), and the kind you acquire through naturalization.

You are insisting that there is a third. It's your own personal fantasy, but it has no legal precedent.

I would thank you for playing, but you really haven't played at all, because your deck is incomplete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2011, 07:39 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
Nonsense. Wong was affirmed a citizen not.... a natural born citizen. His parents were permanent residents at his birth. This is in the decision.

Obama's father was not a permanent resident.
Note again the definition of natural born citizen provided by Wong Kim Ark. Permanent residency of the parents is irrelevant.

Quote:
It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.


III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2011, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
The US Supreme Court said he did...
It has been proved that he did not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2011, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,822,779 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
The only people who care what Barney Fife does down in Arizona are the people in Arizona. Fortunately, he has no affect on anyone else. If they are stupid enough to continue reelect him, that is there problem.
Not nearly as stupid as those who voted for Barry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top