Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-05-2011, 01:27 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,766,243 times
Reputation: 6856

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Why is it a different topic?
Because the topic is the waste, fraud, and abuse in the Pentagon budget and a way to try and fix it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-05-2011, 01:29 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,766,243 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isitmeorarethingsnuts? View Post
What would be so difficult in just cutting say...7% from each departments budget and making them decipher their own waste. Then have a commision go in in maybe 5 years to try to find more waste. If they can't get rid of their own waste, let an independant commision show them how it's done.

The waste is ridiculous and would solve our problems while affecting very few.
Because a simple to answer to a complex issue usually never works. Just cutting the Pentagon 7% does nothing to make what they are doing any more efficient. They would still be wasting some money, just at a slightly smaller scale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2011, 01:31 PM
 
2,501 posts, read 3,647,683 times
Reputation: 1803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Because a simple to answer to a complex issue usually never works. Just cutting the Pentagon 7% does nothing to make what they are doing any more efficient. They would still be wasting some money, just at a slightly smaller scale.
Then how about a gradually increasing cut as time goes by? How about starting at 10% cuts everywhere and gradually building up until about 45% or more?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2011, 01:35 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,766,243 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by CancerianMoonPrincess View Post
Then how about a gradually increasing cut as time goes by? How about starting at 10% cuts everywhere and gradually building up until about 45% or more?
Just cutting things across the board is too simple. A complete review and audit of everything a department and program is doing is the better way to go. We should be going about it as what do we need and what can we get rid of. Whatever is left over should be reformed and streamlined as much as possible. Then after that we should balance the budget and pay for it without borrowing. I'm talking about across the board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top