Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think we should go after the Democrats who fell for the "Bush lies" and hold them accountable.
Before Bush took office, right? Cause we know there were a whole lot of dems calling for regime change and worried about those WMDs.
Epic, classic thread FAIL.
Quote:
The New York Times on the eve of George W. Bush's inauguration said Saddam Hussein, weapons of mass destruction, were his greatest threat. The Washington Post said the greatest foreign policy threat to George W. Bush on the eve of his inauguration was Saddam Hussein. And suddenly George W. Bush decides to go into Iraq, and suddenly, sides switch!
Of course...haven't we seen the very same hypocrisy concerning obama's war(S)?
Clinton got impeached because Republicans only care about the next election. They wanted Clinton to look bad which is why they impeached him (He was impeached!) and also why they gave him zero support in fighting terrorism (Six attacks on Clinton's watch!)
Clinton got impeached because Republicans only care about the next election. They wanted Clinton to look bad which is why they impeached him (He was impeached!) and also why they gave him zero support in fighting terrorism (Six attacks on Clinton's watch!)
It could have been because he lied under oath and obstructed justice...you know, the reasons he was disbarred?
Bubba had all the support he could have wanted, but he ignored all the attacks against America throughout the 90s.
Seeing the Lewinsky thread and thinking of how the house impeached Clinton over lying about it. I am wondering why noone tried to impeach or otherwise indict Bush/Cheney for manufacturing the justification for a war in Iraq?
I think one offense pales in comparison to the other. Why the difference?
Probably because the president and congress were all reacting to the same intelligence reports. in fact, Bush/Cheney manufactured nothing, and it was congress that voted to allow the president to act.
I would like to bring to your attention, that that's how it's done IAW the constitution, and Moonbat Obama should be impeached for violating the constitution in Libya.
Seeing the Lewinsky thread and thinking of how the house impeached Clinton over lying about it. I am wondering why noone tried to impeach or otherwise indict Bush/Cheney for manufacturing the justification for a war in Iraq?
If you insist on claiming it was a lie, then Clinton lied about that, too.
The only reason members of Congress and the Senate thought there were WMD's in Iraq is because they were lied to by the Bush Administration.
No. They all were told that by Clinton, the UN, and other countries' intel agencies. See my post, above.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
