Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-20-2011, 03:14 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,115,129 times
Reputation: 11095

Advertisements

Quote:
This is one of the reasons President Clinton had a booming economy. He raised taxes on the wealthy. Rather than pay the higher tax rate by extracting profits for personal use and having it sit on the sidelines, they re-invested it, creating a chain reaction of jobs.

What we are seeing today is lower taxes leading to owners extracting money rather than reinvesting it. The cash sits on the sidelines in bank accounts, or in their wallets. So let’s raise taxes, and “force” this idle cash back into businesses for reinvestment and create the jobs this country needs.
What Conservatives Won't Tell You: Higher Taxes Equal Reinvestment And Jobs


Anybody that has a brain or not in absolute denial knows that this is the case, but admitting it means admitting that the GOP/Tea/Neocon Party is filled with crooks and liars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-20-2011, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
What Conservatives Won't Tell You: Higher Taxes Equal Reinvestment And Jobs


Anybody that has a functioning brain or not in absolute denial knows that this is the case, but admitting it means admitting that the GOP/Tea/Neocon Party is filled with crooks and liars.
There you go (with a correction).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2011, 03:17 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,134,270 times
Reputation: 13794
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
What Conservatives Won't Tell You: Higher Taxes Equal Reinvestment And Jobs


Anybody that has a brain or not in absolute denial knows that this is the case, but admitting it means admitting that the GOP/Tea/Neocon Party is filled with crooks and liars.
You can raise taxes during a booming economy, and can get away with it, because profits are being made. 0bama wants to raise taxes during an economy that is as bad as the Great Depression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2011, 03:18 PM
 
Location: in a cabin overlooking the mountains
3,078 posts, read 4,373,819 times
Reputation: 2276
Yes well many Republicans still cling to the illusion that Reagan's "trickle down" theory was responsible for the economic boom in the 80s, when in reality it was attributable to the effects of Carter's policies kicking in. So I agree, many Republicans are in denial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2011, 03:19 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,260,120 times
Reputation: 1578
Tax Cuts Create Jobs™





































































































































































trollface.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2011, 03:20 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,363,905 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
What Conservatives Won't Tell You: Higher Taxes Equal Reinvestment And Jobs


Anybody that has a brain or not in absolute denial knows that this is the case, but admitting it means admitting that the GOP/Tea/Neocon Party is filled with crooks and liars.

Clinton had a booming economy because he came into office as a recession was ending. He reduced spending after the Republicans who took over Congress in 1994 forced him to do so. After that, consumer confidence skyrocketed. It may have continued if he hadn't signed NAFTA and the China Trade Act of 2000, repealed Glass Steigal and left mortgage backed securities unregulated on advice of Summers and Rubin..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2011, 03:20 PM
 
1,457 posts, read 2,027,339 times
Reputation: 1407
How am I personally going to buy more if you take away from my ability to pay for it. Is it really rocket science ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2011, 03:22 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Clinton had a booming economy because he came into office as a recession was ending. He reduced spending after the Republicans who took over Congress in 1994 forced him to do so. After that, consumer confidice skyrocked. It may have continued if he hadn't signed NAFTA and the China Trade Act of 2000.
So did Bush. And while the recession ended in Nov 2001, the economy really never recovered, and while housing boom helped for couple of years, the house of cards collapsed like never before in decades.

But then, you'd think that Clinton's policies would have had an adverse effect on growth as opposed to y'all having to come up with excuses?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2011, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,363,905 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
So did Bush. And while the recession ended in Nov 2001, the economy really never recovered, and while housing boom helped for couple of years, the house of cards collapsed like never before in decades.

But then, you'd think that Clinton's policies would have had an adverse effect on growth as opposed to y'all having to come up with excuses?

5% unemployment is "never really recovered"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2011, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
5% unemployment is "never really recovered"?
Correct. But if you don't want to see actual job growth, the actual wage growth, the world of denial is all you need. Next, you might claim that the economy under Bush was far better than it was under Reagan's first term since the unemployment rate then was well over 7% (and over 9% for couple of years). Try it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top