Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What do you think?
True 13 26.53%
False 36 73.47%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-23-2011, 11:25 AM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,261,634 times
Reputation: 1578

Advertisements

True or False?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-23-2011, 02:34 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,261,634 times
Reputation: 1578
No comments?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 02:39 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,850,642 times
Reputation: 9283
Cutting taxes and raising taxes won't raise revenue... why? Because if you don't control spending any taxes whether its an increase or a decrease wouldn't mean a dang thing... PERIOD
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Greer
2,213 posts, read 2,843,672 times
Reputation: 1737
Your poll question doesn't make sense.

Cutting taxes by $1 trillion reduces revenue by $1 trillion by definition.

The question we could be discussing is how cutting tax rates by a certain percentage will affect tax revenues.

Or, whether cutting taxes by $1 trillion in one year will affect tax revenues the next year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 02:48 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,261,634 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvsteve View Post
Your poll question doesn't make sense.

Cutting taxes by $1 trillion reduces revenue by $1 trillion by definition.
Some people disagree with you:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 05:20 PM
 
5,915 posts, read 4,812,128 times
Reputation: 1398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
Some people disagree with you:
People vote "True" in protest of blatant stupidity of this poll.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 05:30 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,280,030 times
Reputation: 3296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
True or False?
Getting rid of some hurtful regulations, reducing the size of government by a third and limiting all social services execept for the elderly or very disabled would be a propper start. Lowering taxes some could create volume of more tax money coming in, but you have to cut government spending to really get stuff done.
Smaller less costly government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 05:31 PM
 
1,733 posts, read 1,822,038 times
Reputation: 1135
Those countries that have high taxes, do they have a lot of revenue? How about the nations with low taxes, how are their revenue affected?

I mean, its not like there aren't a lot of nations out there where we can see the effects of high and low taxes, why are we speculating on this like it was entirely hypothetical?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 05:34 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,085 posts, read 12,053,112 times
Reputation: 4125
Argumentum ad populum is the logical fallacy that just because something is popular, it is therefore true.

Quote:
This logical fallacy is often used by children as an excuse for wanting something (everybody's got one), or doing something (everybody's doing it). Despite the juvenile nature of the argument, it is often used by people who should know better, particularly by those who are trying to force other people to their way of thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2011, 05:47 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,966,662 times
Reputation: 7315
I'd love to see people put their skin in the game. I'd favor extending Bush tax cuts for the wealthy not as a pure cut, but as a credit to the pre-Bush tax rates which would be SEIZED immediately if after another 2 year extension, tax revenue was not up 200% of the cost of the credit from the period ending 12/2012. In other words, if we assume the 35% bracket would be 38.6% pre-Bush (and I'm not looking up exact #s), have the entity involved show a calculated tax for 38.6%, and a credit for 3.6%, and the latter is due immediately and seized if by 12/2014 revenue is not up 200% cost of these credits vs 12/2012.

Last edited by bobtn; 09-23-2011 at 06:11 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top