Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you agree with Herb Cain's plan?
Yes, increase taxes on the poor and cut taxes on the rich 13 28.89%
No, that's crazy 32 71.11%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-03-2011, 01:51 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,833,055 times
Reputation: 12828

Advertisements

Again another poll so skewed there is no way to vote. Why does the OP troll thusly when he/she could actually create a decent and substinative poll?

While I agree with the 9% consumption tax proposed by Cain I do not agree with it in conjunction with a federal income tax. I believe in a consumption tax in place of income and estate taxes. Before he came up with his 999 plan Cain also endorsed such a plan.

The "poor" appears to be the 47%+ who pay no federal income tax but whose representatives legislate their consitituents more and more entitlement money from those who do pay federal income tax. They are also that portion of society which require more public services and resources.

A consumption tax might make those who vote themselves money take a second look when they realize it will also affect their bottom line (financially speaking). Of course, the entitlement mentality is just as difficult to overcome as convincing a crack addict that one more high won't solve his/her problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2011, 01:51 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,244,990 times
Reputation: 1577
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
It's Herman Cain -

Herman Cain for President

I couldn't care less who Herb is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2011, 01:53 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,404,194 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
pole



Just in case you don't want to watch the entire video I took a screenshot:
the screan shot is false

current $20k...pays NOTHING in income tax
current 55k pays nearly nothing in federal income tax

both do pay 7% to ss/mediacre, but many even get back most of that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2011, 01:54 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,244,990 times
Reputation: 1577
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Again another poll so skewed there is no way to vote. Why does the OP troll thusly when he/she could actually create a decent and substinative poll?

While I agree with the 9% consumption tax proposed by Cain I do not agree with it in conjunction with a federal income tax. I believe in a consumption tax in place of income and estate taxes. Before he came up with his 999 plan Cain also endorsed such a plan.

The "poor" appears to be the 47%+ who pay no federal income tax but whose representatives legislate their consitituents more and more entitlement money from those who do pay federal income tax. They are also that portion of society which require more public services and resources.

A consumption tax might make those who vote themselves money take a second look when they realize it will also affect their bottom line (financially speaking). Of course, the entitlement mentality is just as difficult to overcome as convincing a crack addict that one more high won't solve his/her problems.
This is talking about total taxes paid, not just federal income taxes. There is no group of people in this country that has a negative effective tax rate when you include local taxes, sales taxes and the payroll tax. As the chart shows (if you trust the CSM), the poor will see a tax increase while the wealthy will get a massive tax cut.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2011, 01:55 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,244,990 times
Reputation: 1577
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
the screan shot is false

current $20k...pays NOTHING in income tax
current 55k pays nearly nothing in federal income tax

both do pay 7% to ss/mediacre, but many even get back most of that
The chart was total taxes paid, not just federal income tax alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2011, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,749,461 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
current $20k...pays NOTHING in income tax
They do, if they don't have enough deductions. And there are plenty of millionaires as well, who pay nothing in income tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2011, 01:56 PM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,614,249 times
Reputation: 1544
In my mind, the biggest problem with our tax code is all the loopholes and deductions. Cain's 9/9/9 plan would supposedly close those loopholes, and that's a good thing, because those loopholes distort economic decision making, which causes malinvestment and kills jobs.

However -- the second-biggest problem with our tax code is that we rely too heavily on taxing wages instead of wealth (or wealth gains, or wealth disbursement). Poor and middle class people get most of their annual income through wages, rich people get most of their annual income through dividends and capital gains. Cain's plan eliminates dividend taxes, capital gains taxes, and inheritance taxes -- therefore you'd basically be exempting rich people from taxes, and that's a horrible idea.

The chart, as shown, is irrelevant to me. I think showing the "rich" as $300k/year earners is stupid and misleading. The rich are not defined by their annual income, and even if they were, $300k/year isn't rich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2011, 01:56 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,244,990 times
Reputation: 1577
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
They do, if they don't have enough deductions.
Don't you find it ironic that this guys name is workingclasshero yet the only thing I see him agree with are things that will benefit the rich and hurt the poor such as Cain's 999 plan?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2011, 02:00 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 18,999,727 times
Reputation: 10270
Yet more disingenuous drivel from the left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2011, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,749,461 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
Don't you find it ironic that this guys name is workingclasshero yet the only thing I see him agree with are things that will benefit the rich and hurt the poor such as Cain's 999 plan?
WCH is one of those self-defeaters who blames himself for not paying zero dollars in federal income tax, and carries that "taxed enough already" banner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top