Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-06-2011, 07:12 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,489,598 times
Reputation: 16962

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
It's not about whether or not you are a flaming gay, or a person who wants his/her personal life to be just that, personal. It's about human nature, and human sexuality.

If it is considered unwise to let men and women share the same living and shower areas, it's also unwise, for the same reasons, to let gays, lesbians and bi-sexual people to do the same.

We aren't keeping the living quarters and showers for men and women separate, because of misogynistic tendencies of men, gender bigotry, or the ick factor women experience if they think a fellow soldier ogled them. We keep them separate because we do not want sexual relations and romances among the ranks of our soldiers within their units.

And this would be because......? An ancient belief that soldiers in the thick of battle should not have thoughts of anything other than the enemy in front of them.

That's all fine, we get it, it just doesn't track and never has, you've always had soldiers, sailors, airmen who've been married and had young families, being transported overseas to fight and they somehow all managed to remain focused on the job at hand regardless of the thoughts of loved ones left behind.

The most glaring example of a love triangle that was allowed to get out of hand was that 16" turret explosion on the old Iowa.

There are many armies around the world that have had members of both genders and they were forced through circumstances to "mix" at virtually every opportunity of daily living AND fighting. Russia fought off the Germans with high concentrations of females in their army and their air force and I'd bet my last dollar they ate slept, drank, bathed and perhaps even got intimate on occasion and yet it didn't seem to give the Germans the edge when they were faced with all those screaming soldiers of both genders coming at them with automatic weapons.

I'll save references to Vietnam and their female and male interaction along with their effectiveness as a unit for a later rebuttel.

Your viewpoint is skewed with your understandable but mistaken belief yours are the absolute best military and none others compete on any scale, that is just not so in consideration of the individual serviceperson. We're not talking technology or hardware here, we're talking people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-06-2011, 07:29 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Once again, every NATO nation has had gays openly serving for a long time, without separate facilities and no glaring problems. Common sense and evidence therefore indicate that it's only an issue for Americans, and that's directly attributable to evangelical/fundie Christians.
And Islamic fundamentalists. I believe Iran claims to have zero gays, which is something many Americans want to say and believe as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 07:39 AM
 
1,081 posts, read 916,078 times
Reputation: 551
If they have to share quarters then a normal soldier should be able to beat the crap out of a gay soldier without it being labeled a hate crime. Since he's one of the "boys", right? That's good to know, if the need ever arises...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 07:42 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyBaaBaa View Post
If they have to share quarters then a normal soldier should be able to beat the crap out of a gay soldier without it being labeled a hate crime. Since he's one of the "boys", right? That's good to know, if the need ever arises...
What idiocy! Besides, you only make it clearer that the right wingers feel better when they have their head stuck in the sand, rather than being aware of the reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:06 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,384,541 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backspace View Post
Science has also shown that homosexuality is a mental disorder, why do you believe some science but not other science?
No. It hasn't. Over 50 years of 'science' has shown that it is NOT a 'mental disorder'. Which is why it was removed from the DSM. It took protests from gay activists and changing social attiutudes to get the APA to review all the empirical data. Once they did review all the studies and literature, they couldn't justify keeping it in any longer. Other health organizations around the world and in the US had already recognised this, it just took the APA a little longer because of the group of old-school conservative and religiously biased practitioners who used to use all sorts of 'treatments' like castration, testicle implants, chemical castration, cliterectomies, electro-shock therapy, BT etc to try to "cure' something that wasn't a mental disorder in the first place.

You keep on making the same silly statements but you have yet to come up with anything to back up it up. Because you can't.

You have my sympathies for your lack of abilities to cope with people who are different to you.

Last edited by Ceist; 10-06-2011 at 08:16 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:07 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,774,139 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backspace View Post
Science has also shown that homosexuality is a mental disorder, why do you believe some science but not other science?
No it hasn't, but I know you like to spread that lie around here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:08 AM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,443,162 times
Reputation: 24980
Quote:
Absolutely not.
People should not receive special treatment because of their sexual habits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:10 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,774,139 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
I think you should be separated from normal servicemembers in quarters. It's not bigotry to not want to sleep next to and shower with homosexuals.
Sure it is. And ironically, most male on male sexual assaults in the military (and there are a lot) are by heterosexuals.

What's the big deal about showering with a gay guy? Do you seriously think every gay guy is going to try to molest you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:19 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,384,541 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by valerie d View Post
Been in what? I think they should not serve in seperate barracks. I think they should serve in seperate brigades. Here comes the gay brigade, oh look the color guard is carried by the transgenders!
You also have my sympathy for your inability to cope with people who are different to you. There is a cure for it, but you really have to be motivated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:22 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,384,541 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
The way it has always been in the past, when unit commnader has 12 new soldiers checking into the barracks of his unit, he separates the men from the women.

With gays serving openly, and the same unit commander has 12 people checking in, he may end up with:

2 straight men
2 straight women
2 gay men
2 bisexual men
2 lesbians women
2 bisexual women

If the commander has three man rooms, who is he supposed to assign to which room, and not expect any problems?
If the straight men are fundamentalists or evangelicals, best to put them in a room by themselves because they may not have the capacity to cope with anyone different to them.

Everyone else will get along just fine together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top