Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:54 PM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 18,997,649 times
Reputation: 5224

Advertisements

Democrats mobilize over Clarence Thomas ethics investigation | The Ticket - Yahoo! News

I hope that they finally are successful at destroying this incompetent Justice. He is an insult to the seat once held by the great Thurgood Marshall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:56 PM
 
4,042 posts, read 3,528,510 times
Reputation: 1968
Seriously? take a good man down and continue to raise up, what?
A fumbling Communist leader?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 08:58 PM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,645 posts, read 38,644,789 times
Reputation: 11780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunnysee View Post
Seriously? take a good man down and continue to raise up, what?
A fumbling Communist leader?!
At least the Commie would actually say something once in a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 09:01 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,975,697 times
Reputation: 4555
You know just from a purely objective legal standpoint. Many impartial Constitutional scholars consider him a really weak Justice. He turned out to be a real dud...not just from a liberal point of view but from an objective comparison to other judges. He just doesn't have the intellect. He went 5 years without asking a question during oral arguments. Pathetic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 09:01 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,304,477 times
Reputation: 4894
You only want him out of the way so you can get the illegal ObamaScam through.

There are 3 libs in this group that are anti American and need to be removed and you want to go after this one.

2 of the 3 looney tune libs use foreign law to make decisions for us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 09:02 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,945,761 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunnysee View Post
Seriously? take a good man down and continue to raise up, what?
A fumbling Communist leader?!
Thomas has major conflict of interest problems as well as that he lied on his mandated disclosure forms.

Regardless of whether you like his viewpoint or not, a Supreme Court justice must be above suspicion of being unduly influenced by corruption or undo influence. The fact that his wife takes money from groups that her husband is ruling on is an ethical problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 09:02 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,749,261 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehotex View Post
Democrats mobilize over Clarence Thomas ethics investigation | The Ticket - Yahoo! News

I hope that they finally are successful at destroying this incompetent Justice. He is an insult to the seat once held by the great Thurgood Marshall.
It is really astonishing how little the left knows.

CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin on Clarence Thomas: “Rarely Has A Supreme Court Justice Enjoyed Such Broad Vindication.” | The Kitchen Cabinet.US (http://thekitchencabinet.us/2011/09/03/cnns-jeffrey-toobin-on-clarence-thomas-rarely-has-a-supreme-court-justice-enjoyed-such-broad-vindication/ - broken link)

"The greatest revenge is success. Clarence Thomas may go down in judicial history as the most important voice on the Court in two decades. In Toobin’s New Yorker article, Steve Calabresi, a law professor at Northwestern and co-founder of the Federalist Society says, “(Thomas’ opinions) are very scholarly, with lots of historical sources, and his views are the most principled, even among the conservatives. He has staked out some bold positions, and then the Court has set out and moved in his direction.”"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,945,761 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days-in-Florida View Post

2 of the 3 looney tune libs use foreign law to make decisions for us.
Can you provide examples of your claim? What foreign laws? Or is that just something Rush said and now you are regurgitating it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 09:09 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,945,761 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
It is really astonishing how little the left knows.

CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin on Clarence Thomas: “Rarely Has A Supreme Court Justice Enjoyed Such Broad Vindication.” | The Kitchen Cabinet.US (http://thekitchencabinet.us/2011/09/03/cnns-jeffrey-toobin-on-clarence-thomas-rarely-has-a-supreme-court-justice-enjoyed-such-broad-vindication/ - broken link)

"The greatest revenge is success. Clarence Thomas may go down in judicial history as the most important voice on the Court in two decades. In Toobin’s New Yorker article, Steve Calabresi, a law professor at Northwestern and co-founder of the Federalist Society says, “(Thomas’ opinions) are very scholarly, with lots of historical sources, and his views are the most principled, even among the conservatives. He has staked out some bold positions, and then the Court has set out and moved in his direction.”"
Why don't your link the actual article and not someone cherry picking phrases? This is the article: The Thomases vs. Obama’s Health-Care Plan : The New Yorker

And this is how it starts:
Quote:
t has been, in certain respects, a difficult year for Clarence Thomas. In January, he was compelled to amend several years of the financial-disclosure forms that Supreme Court Justices must file each year. The document requires the Justices to disclose the source of all income earned by their spouses, and Thomas had failed to note that his wife, Virginia, who is known as Ginni, worked as a representative for a Michigan college and at the Heritage Foundation. The following month, seventy-four members of Congress called on Thomas to recuse himself from any legal challenges to President Obama’s health-care reform, because his wife has been an outspoken opponent of the law. At around the same time, Court observers noted the fifth anniversary of the last time that Thomas had asked a question during an oral argument. The confluence of these events produced the kind of public criticism, and even mockery, that Thomas had largely managed to avoid since his tumultuous arrival on the Court, twenty years ago this fall.

Read more The Thomases vs. Obama’s Health-Care Plan : The New Yorker
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2011, 09:12 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,809,014 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunnysee View Post
Seriously? take a good man down and continue to raise up, what?
A fumbling Communist leader?!
He's a puppet to the Koch's and the epitome of cronyism and fascism, things the GOP strive for
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top