BIOFUELS - - -
Editorial: The Nonsense of Biofuels - Michel - 2012 - Angewandte Chemie International Edition - Wiley Online Library
- Biodiesel : 0.1% efficient
- Bioethanol : less than 0.2%, and
- Biogas : around 0.3%.
- Photovoltaic solar cell : 15% efficient
Summation -- the energy efficiency of
photosynthesis is so small, that it is a
waste of resources to "grow" fuel instead of food.
{recycling food and human wastes is reasonable}
Recommendation -- use present solar, direct or indirect, to generate electricity. Use it to power electric traction rail.
================================================== ==
What proves rail is cheaper over the long term?
[] common sense -
[] lower energy cost -
[] less surface area per unit cargo or passengers -
[] less pollution -
[] durable -
[] higher capacity -
Budget
In 1920, 90% of all travel was by electric traction rail (streetcars), average fare - $0.05. ($36.50 annual cost for taking a round trip every day; 730 x 5 cents.)
In 1920, you could buy a brand new Ford Model T for $300.00
In 1935, you could buy a brand new Plymouth for $565.00.
In 1979, you could buy a Honda Accord for $7000.00.
In 2012, you can buy a Ford Focus for $16,500.00
In 2012, 30-Day Unlimited Ride MetroCard on NYC mass transit - Cost: $104, reduced fare $52
(per annum = $ 1,248 / $ 624) (Children ride free, if with fare paying adult)
2012 Ford Focus 2.0L 4-cyl. 5-speed Manual True Cost to Own
$31,115 over five years is the "true cost to own" that Ford Focus.
$6,223 per year.
In relation to minimum wage ($7.25 / hour), that expense computes to 41% of gross wages. If one earns
double minimum wage, that's 20.6% of pre-tax gross wages. In that case, one will be working 1/5 their life to "support" their habit. If one works from 18 to 70 (assuming later age of retirement), the automobile costs them over
TEN YEARS of labor.
- The point: The buying power of funny munny keeps dropping (prices keep inflating), which wipes out the benefit of "saving". (Thanks! Congress)
- The point: Inflation is a hidden tax increase as well as a hidden pressure to increase government budgets, which increases deficits.
- The point: To afford a modest car, a necessity in many locations, consumes a large proportion of one's earnings, and indirectly consumes resources, via taxation to build, improve, and maintain the extensive infrastructure that it requires.
- The point: Is it really worth it for government to SUBSIDIZE automobiles - one of the most expensive, wasteful, inefficient means of land transport?
- Is it worth it to YOU to spend over ten years working just so you have the convenience? And work even more "for the government" who expends it on automobile infrastructure?