Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Way to take personal responsibility for the items you post and then comment on repeatedly. By that logic we can post garbage from some birther website and then when shown it's a bunch of bunk say that's not our fault.
I only tell people they need to get an education when they are opining on topics they clearly don't understand. Clearly we all have holes in our education, I would have thought that was a given? So, if I ever correct you on your grammar feel free to call me out as you clearly seem to have a better grasp of it that I.
You just don't seem to get it. Not surprising. I really don't care if every conservative out there looks at porn. I don't care who looks at more porn the liberals or the conservatives. It does not matter to me if the methodology of the poll produced by ABC is accurate or not. I have never defended the methodology in any of my posts. You guys focusing on that have missed the forrest because of the trees.
The purpose of the post was to show the hypocricy of things like the values summit and to stimulate discussion. In that respect, it was a success.
But while we are talking about math, methodology and conservative porn. Here is a combination of all. The formula below is what makes the perfect butt.
In this formula, S stands for overall shape, C for circularity, B for bounciness, F for firmness and T for texture. When a woman has given herself unswervingly honest marks between 1 and 20 for all of these, and measured the ratio of her hips to her waist (V), they can all be entered into the equation and used to calculate just how ready the world is likely to be for her jelly.
The conservative porn apologists are keeping this thread alive? I think this study is a pretty good gauge of conservative porn viewing habits. The case that you conservative pornographers are trying to make is that it's the liberals in the conservative zip codes who are watching the porn. Seriously? Why would liberals in conservative zip codes watch more porn than liberals in liberal zip codes? That doesn't make sense. This study is not perfect, but it's a pretty good way to capture con porn habits. More porn is viewed in areas with higher concentrations of conservatives. Of course liberals in these areas are probably watching porn too, but the higher concentration of conservatives is correlated to a higher concenetration of porn viewing. That's not 100 percent proof, but it's a good indicator of what's going on.
The conservative porn apologists are keeping this thread alive? I think this study is a pretty good gauge of conservative porn viewing habits. The case that you conservative pornographers are trying to make is that it's the liberals in the conservative zip codes who are watching the porn. Seriously? Why would liberals in conservative zip codes watch more porn than liberals in liberal zip codes? That doesn't make sense. This study is not perfect, but it's a pretty good way to capture con porn habits. More porn is viewed in areas with higher concentrations of conservatives. Of course liberals in these areas are probably watching porn too, but the higher concentration of conservatives is correlated to a higher concenetration of porn viewing. That's not 100 percent proof, but it's a good indicator of what's going on.
I think it is so telling that they become very defensive. No, no we don't look at porn.
The conservative porn apologists are keeping this thread alive? I think this study is a pretty good gauge of conservative porn viewing habits. The case that you conservative pornographers are trying to make is that it's the liberals in the conservative zip codes who are watching the porn. Seriously? Why would liberals in conservative zip codes watch more porn than liberals in liberal zip codes? That doesn't make sense. This study is not perfect, but it's a pretty good way to capture con porn habits. More porn is viewed in areas with higher concentrations of conservatives. Of course liberals in these areas are probably watching porn too, but the higher concentration of conservatives is correlated to a higher concenetration of porn viewing. That's not 100 percent proof, but it's a good indicator of what's going on.
Perhaps, and for what it's worth, I'm not a conservative porn apologist; my views on things like this are more libertarian - I just don't care what people do.
I'm just looking at it from the perspective of what the study can show. It may be absolutely correct in the assumptions - it may not. For example, in areas of Utah or other areas that they point out, are stores that sell porn prevalent - as prevalent as in "liberal areas"? If not, then online access may be the only means so the numbers may be skewed. For example, I live in an area where alcohol sales used to be illegal on Sunday, so everyone purchased it on Saturday (thankfully no longer the case). You could look at sales on Saturday in comparison with other places and draw a conclusion that may or may not be correct because the data is skewed by limited access on Sunday.
Either way, it appears that online access is working for people that seek it which is okay with me.
The conservative porn apologists are keeping this thread alive? I think this study is a pretty good gauge of conservative porn viewing habits. The case that you conservative pornographers are trying to make is that it's the liberals in the conservative zip codes who are watching the porn. Seriously? Why would liberals in conservative zip codes watch more porn than liberals in liberal zip codes? That doesn't make sense. This study is not perfect, but it's a pretty good way to capture con porn habits. More porn is viewed in areas with higher concentrations of conservatives. Of course liberals in these areas are probably watching porn too, but the higher concentration of conservatives is correlated to a higher concenetration of porn viewing. That's not 100 percent proof, but it's a good indicator of what's going on.
If you'd read the article you would note that the fundamental methodology used is CREDIT CARD purchases from a single client that operates a cluster of unrevealed pay sites.
Right there you have a huge sample bias ala "Dewey Defeats Truman".
(To refresh memories, that was where they took a phone poll....richer people tended to have phones at the time and were more likely Dewey voters.)
You just don't seem to get it. Not surprising. I really don't care if every conservative out there looks at porn. I don't care who looks at more porn the liberals or the conservatives. It does not matter to me if the methodology of the poll produced by ABC is accurate or not. I have never defended the methodology in any of my posts. You guys focusing on that have missed the forrest because of the trees.
The purpose of the post was to show the hypocricy of things like the values summit and to stimulate discussion. In that respect, it was a success.
But while we are talking about math, methodology and conservative porn. Here is a combination of all. The formula below is what makes the perfect butt.
In this formula, S stands for overall shape, C for circularity, B for bounciness, F for firmness and T for texture. When a woman has given herself unswervingly honest marks between 1 and 20 for all of these, and measured the ratio of her hips to her waist (V), they can all be entered into the equation and used to calculate just how ready the world is likely to be for her jelly.
This still doesn't explain the buttockal-crease effect (winking), now popularized by Winkers.
One should never dismiss the dynamic of the moving parts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
