Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2011, 02:18 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,943,270 times
Reputation: 3159

Advertisements

Most of the GOP candidates, with the exception of Romney and Huntsman have advocated some reduction of the power of Federal Judges.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gop-candidates-would-cut-federal-judges-power/2011/10/ (broken link)

Keep in mind that the SCOTUS has a conservative majority, which seems to make no difference to the candidates.

I think these are really bad ideas.

The Federal Courts should remain independent. They should have lifetime appointments to keep the independence from political elections. That is just a terrible idea.

As Justice Scalia (one of the most conservative members on the court) has said, if congress does not agree with our interpretation of the constitution then all they have to do is change the constitution. It is set up for that very thing.

Kudos to Romney and Huntsman for being on the right side of the issue. Paul is the most correct of the legal remedies available as to limiting jurisdiction, so I give him credit for understanding how the constitution works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2011, 04:38 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,450,111 times
Reputation: 4799
Another shot at the link? It's broken.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 04:49 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,943,270 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
Another shot at the link? It's broken.
Try this.

Most GOP presidential candidates would curb federal judges, though majority appointed by GOP - The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/whitehouse/most-gop-presidential-candidates-would-curb-federal-judges-though-majority-appointed-by-gop/2011/10/23/gIQA11sE9L_story.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 04:58 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,450,111 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Try this.

Most GOP presidential candidates would curb federal judges, though majority appointed by GOP - The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/whitehouse/most-gop-presidential-candidates-would-curb-federal-judges-though-majority-appointed-by-gop/2011/10/23/gIQA11sE9L_story.html - broken link)
That works.

The republicans are wrong on this one. If for no other reason that it stops the accent to the U.S. Supreme Court for many of our most pressing issues. This has to be something of a talking point during an election cycle because it would never actually occur.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 05:02 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,943,270 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
That works.

The republicans are wrong on this one. If for no other reason that it stops the accent to the U.S. Supreme Court for many of our most pressing issues. This has to be something of a talking point during an election cycle because it would never actually occur.
The article states that they actually want to be able to overrule the Supreme Court. There are two lawyers in the group, and it does not speak well for their legal education. There is only way to overrule the Supreme Court...Amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 05:36 PM
 
5,391 posts, read 7,225,940 times
Reputation: 2857
and these are the people who anoint themselves as defenders of the Constitution and of the founders' original intent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Purgatory (A.K.A. Dallas, Texas)
5,007 posts, read 15,416,797 times
Reputation: 2463
Adding further evidence to the conclusion that these politicians are nothing more than pandering idiots telling people what they think those people want to hear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Occupied Georgia CSA
529 posts, read 363,629 times
Reputation: 170
Make term limits that would work great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 05:41 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,191,594 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Most of the GOP candidates, with the exception of Romney and Huntsman have advocated some reduction of the power of Federal Judges.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gop-candidates-would-cut-federal-judges-power/2011/10/ (broken link)

Keep in mind that the SCOTUS has a conservative majority, which seems to make no difference to the candidates.

I think these are really bad ideas.

The Federal Courts should remain independent. They should have lifetime appointments to keep the independence from political elections. That is just a terrible idea.

As Justice Scalia (one of the most conservative members on the court) has said, if congress does not agree with our interpretation of the constitution then all they have to do is change the constitution. It is set up for that very thing.

Kudos to Romney and Huntsman for being on the right side of the issue. Paul is the most correct of the legal remedies available as to limiting jurisdiction, so I give him credit for understanding how the constitution works.

I also believe that there should be a Constitutional amendment limiting the executive order power to only effect federal employees, his staff, and the district of columbia.

EO's should not effect everyone in the USA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 05:44 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,388,406 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
The article states that they actually want to be able to overrule the Supreme Court. There are two lawyers in the group, and it does not speak well for their legal education. There is only way to overrule the Supreme Court...Amendment.
There is actually another way, but it hasn't been attempted since 1937.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top