Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-25-2011, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,356,787 times
Reputation: 7990

Advertisements

We've had a thread about 'hispanic' and 'Native American,' now what about 'people of color?'

This term, highly favored by liberals, arbitrarily divides the world into 'white' and 'everybody else.' Implicitly, it says that white is somehow special and set apart.

This term bugs me to no end, and I cringe whenever I hear it. I'm not saying that anyone who uses it is a racist. Some are just misguided and unthinking. But yes, many who use this term are racists. And it's no accident that this term is straight out of the liberal lexicon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-25-2011, 01:28 PM
 
1,759 posts, read 2,029,172 times
Reputation: 950
I'm always wondering just which color.

Pink? Green? Chartreuse? Polka-dotted? Oooh, that would be fun!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2011, 01:50 PM
 
Location: NC
4,100 posts, read 4,515,889 times
Reputation: 1372
This term has always bothered me too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2011, 03:02 PM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,992,868 times
Reputation: 7060
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
'people of color' is racist.
Thank you. I've felt for a while that this term is as offensive and racist as 'negro'. If we really want to be a progressive nation then racist terminology like this needs to be retired from english language.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2011, 03:05 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,194,123 times
Reputation: 7693
Since black is all colors combined does that mean blacks should be the ones complaining the least?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2011, 03:06 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,040,586 times
Reputation: 15038
Call me when white folks stop referring to themselves as white folks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2011, 03:09 PM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,992,868 times
Reputation: 7060
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Call me when white folks stop referring to themselves as white folks.
The only time white people are reminded about their race is when black people bring it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 06:23 AM
 
1,759 posts, read 2,029,172 times
Reputation: 950
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Call me when white folks stop referring to themselves as white folks.
I never have the oppportunity nor the inclination to refer to myself as "white."

But non-white people sure have no problem doing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 06:47 AM
 
5,391 posts, read 7,228,906 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
We've had a thread about 'hispanic' and 'Native American,' now what about 'people of color?'

This term, highly favored by liberals, arbitrarily divides the world into 'white' and 'everybody else.' Implicitly, it says that white is somehow special and set apart.

This term bugs me to no end, and I cringe whenever I hear it. I'm not saying that anyone who uses it is a racist. Some are just misguided and unthinking. But yes, many who use this term are racists. And it's no accident that this term is straight out of the liberal lexicon.
This term, as I have heard it used, is almost exclusively used by racial minorities, not white people. If anything, it implies a shared solidarity among non-whites, not that being white is special.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,356,787 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbobobbo View Post
This term, as I have heard it used, is almost exclusively used by racial minorities, not white people. If anything, it implies a shared solidarity among non-whites, not that being white is special.
I disagree--I have heard the term used by whites many times, typically by journalists, politicians, and other white liberals. Like this for example:
Where are the people of color in national parks? - Travel - News - msnbc.com

Judging by the author's photo, he is white. (BTW, the article, besides providing me with an example, is interesting reading).

In the second place if the term implies a 'shared solidarity among non-whites,' which I agree that it does, does this not imply in turn that whites are somehow set apart from all other races? I don't see how it doesn't. That's why I say that this term is inherently racist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top