Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-26-2011, 06:51 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui View Post
women are not stupid we know what abortion is, there is no need to look at an ultra sound
And yet most abortions are because a baby would be inconvenient at that time...as if they didn't give mush thought to the process....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2011, 06:52 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui View Post
do you want to be second guessed on your decisions? women are not stupid we know what abortion is. viewing an ultra sound is a ploy to try to make women feel guilty about their choice. it is also an extra cost and unnecessary. you in favor of added health care cost for a test that is completely unnecessary?
Why would you feel guilty?

You have to have an exam before having an abortion,you can't just have it done without that....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 06:53 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui View Post
there is no other procedure "similar" before an abortion clinic do talk to the women about their choice and make sure it is something they want to do. most women don't have abortions without a great deal of thought.
Well as most abortions are for convenience sake,it would appear not a lot of thought went into HOW you get pregnant....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 06:56 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonecypher5413 View Post
Your responses on this thread reflect the arrogant and paternalistic notion that you men know what it's like to carry an unwanted pregnancy.

When you've had your sex change and it's YOU lying there on the table and having an equally unwanted ultrasound forced on you "for your own good," you go ahead then and tell me what I should think and feel about what is the most personal and agonizing decision most women in this situation will ever have to make.

Until then, butt out. Or agree to adopt the child you forced on the woman when it's born.
As soon as the laws are changed and the man cannot be held legally responsible for the baby,okay.

But women want it both ways,their decision to make,and a man's job to financially support the baby if they decide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 06:57 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
Making the decision to terminate a pregnancy is an incredibly personal and difficult decision. The only purpose of trying to make women see the ultrasound and hear the heartbeat is to attempt to intimidate and coerce and to make an already difficult event even more so.

It's not necessary and I'm glad the judges are ruling that way.
Why would seeing the ultrasound and hearing the heartbeat intimidate and coerce a woman?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Here and There
2,538 posts, read 3,876,874 times
Reputation: 3790
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
Well as most abortions are for convenience sake,it would appear not a lot of thought went into HOW you get pregnant....
Wow. Just wow. Ignorance abounds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 07:00 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
Link please?
Wow,you support abortion and Planned Parenthood and don't actually know the history?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 07:03 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
Link please?
Margaret Sanger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Margaret Sanger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, In Her Own Words
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 07:04 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
No! Because forcing them to look at a picture or hear the heartbeat is an attempt to make an already difficult situation even more so. Just another right wing, christian attempt at controlling a woman's body.
How would it make it more difficult?
Women aren't making this decision lightly and without a great deal of thought and deliberation,they know what is going to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 07:05 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
We have already seen pictures of fetuses......EVERYWHERE.....on TV, in magazines, posters on the Dr's office walls, in brochures, in biology books in school, on the internet.

Do you really think women don't know what a fetus looks like?
So...there is no harm in seeing the ultrasound of their baby or hearing the heartbeat.

Why would this be uncomfortable to the woman in question?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top