Why Obama Cannot Win in 2012 (Al Gore, polls, elect, states)

[sanrene]

Even some of his staunchest supporters KNOW he is an albatross around their neck.

Richard Durbin | Referendum Election | The Daily Caller

Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin told the Chicago Tribune that if the 2012 election is a “referendum” on President Barack Obama, then Democrats are “in trouble.”

Oh, it will be dickey, you can bet on that.

[Natural510]

He'll win if for no other reason his competition are either hacks disliked by their own party or half-crazed lunatics who continually shoot themselves in the foot.
The economy still stinks, and he's isolated progressives on certain matters (like the pot club bust-ups), but the fact remains the majority still favor matters he's won/pushing, such as troop withdrawal from the Middle East, access to health care for all Americans, and taxing the rich at the same rate as the middle-class. And did I mention the poor options being put forth by the GOP?

[RunninRebel]

Originally Posted by wutitiz

Well a post with emoticon only, no facts, no logic, not even any words, exemplifies the mentality of the anti-Palin brigade. Quite possibly the most thought-challenged faction in US history.

How about four letters?

AGIA

[box_of_zip_disks]

Anyone predicting a Republican presidential win by stating that PA, MI, MN, and NJ are in play because Republicans have won at the state level is an idiot who isn't worth listening to.

[Fleet]

Originally Posted by Theliberalvoice

Obama 2012.

No, thanks. 4 years is 4 too many.

[sanrene]

Originally Posted by box_of_zip_disks

Anyone predicting a Republican presidential win by stating that PA, MI, MN, and NJ are in play because Republicans have won at the state level is an idiot who isn't worth listening to.

Taken a look at obama's numbers in those states lately?

[crbcrbrgv]

Originally Posted by sanrene

Even some of his staunchest supporters KNOW he is an albatross around their neck.

Richard Durbin | Referendum Election | The Daily Caller



Oh, it will be dickey, you can bet on that.

If Dick Durbin told you a car was coming, you'd still let it hit you. Try again.

[Donna-501]

Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv

The main reason Bush won a second term is because of Kerry. He was a bad candidate.

Unless something changes quickly for the GOP, it may very well wind up being the main reason Obama wins. No good candidate.

Exactly!

[Fleet]

Originally Posted by Air Force

I read about 40 articles on why Bush wouldn't/couldn't be elected to a second term. We all know how that turned out.

But the economy was doing well when G.W. Bush was running for re-election.

You might as well start liking the guy. He'll be here for a while longer.

For the good of the country, I certainly hope not.

[AeroGuyDC]

I've said several times that it's the totality of circumstances (not just the economy) that dictates that Barack Obama will be a one-term President. He's a shiitty President. That's the bottom line.

This article seems to corroborate my assertion.