Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-08-2011, 10:29 PM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,327,319 times
Reputation: 3235

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
It is disgusting and it should be viewed on the same scale as the Satanic Church scandal.
No, it shouldn't. This was a case involving one person who was accused of acting inappropriately; the Catholic church involved multiple incidents, and there was an institutional practice of keeping the scandals within the confines of Canon law.

Quote:
It also proves might point, that people are basically "not good."
It proves nothing of the sort. What it proves is that people have a hard time confronting someone they trust and admire about a potentially ugly truth.

What they did was wrong, and people suffered severely for it -- no doubt about that. But the bad judgment of these individuals neither proves nor disproves the goodness of humanity. It just shows how hard it is for people to confront the ugly truth about people they think they know.

Joe Paterno probably made a terrible decision not to go further with this information, but that doesn't mean that he's not a good person. People can be good and they can make terrible decisions, which turn out to be costly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2011, 03:06 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL SouthWest Suburbs
3,522 posts, read 6,097,600 times
Reputation: 6130
Quote:
Originally Posted by chickenfriedbananas View Post
No, it shouldn't. This was a case involving one person who was accused of acting inappropriately; the Catholic church involved multiple incidents, and there was an institutional practice of keeping the scandals within the confines of Canon law.



It proves nothing of the sort. What it proves is that people have a hard time confronting someone they trust and admire about a potentially ugly truth.

What they did was wrong, and people suffered severely for it -- no doubt about that. But the bad judgment of these individuals neither proves nor disproves the goodness of humanity. It just shows how hard it is for people to confront the ugly truth about people they think they know.

Joe Paterno probably made a terrible decision not to go further with this information, but that doesn't mean that he's not a good person. People can be good and they can make terrible decisions, which turn out to be costly.
No way , Here you have a ONCE legend of the Grid Iron fall on his face.
There is not a chance in He** A great coach who makes game time decisions did not fully understand the consequences.

Or he did know the consequences and he rolled the dice.

I agree with alot the posters on many points.
It is just a story ripped right out of the WHAT book of life.

Very sad for the victims
Sad for the lives this story is going to touch.

Its also going to rip to shreds Joe Paterno for the whole career at PSU.

A gem of a program at one time and a leader who wanted to much to leave at the top.

All crumbled.
And to think of all the good this man coach did for Youth.
Its truly stranger than fiction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2011, 05:28 AM
 
28,164 posts, read 25,282,565 times
Reputation: 16665
Quote:
Originally Posted by temazepam View Post
I don't understand: why were those boys on a college campus?
Because they were participants of Sandusky's charity for at-risk boys called "Second Mile". He allegedly used the charity as a way to be in contact with young boys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2011, 05:30 AM
 
28,164 posts, read 25,282,565 times
Reputation: 16665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
C


Lots of cites to professional peer-reviewed journals here.

Most of those threads that have those cites discuss the legalization of pedophilia.


Well, I'll wait until the person who said such a ridiculous statement to back it up. Thanks for telling me that though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2011, 05:56 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,373,171 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Lots of cites to professional peer-reviewed journals here.
Here you go:

“The research to date all points to there being no significant relationship between a homosexual lifestyle and child molestation. There appears to be practically no reportage of sexual molestation of girls by lesbian adults, and the adult male who sexually molests young boys is not likely to be homosexual."
Groth, A. N., & Gary, T. S. (1982). Heterosexuality, homosexuality, and pedophilia: Sexual offenses against children and adult sexual orientation.

**************************

"Homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia are not synonymous. In fact, it may be that these two orientations are mutually exclusive, the reason being that the homosexual male is sexually attracted to masculine qualities whereas the heterosexual male is sexually attracted to feminine characteristics, and the sexually immature child’s qualities are more feminine than masculine. . . . The child offender who is attracted to and engaged in adult sexual relationships is heterosexual. It appears, therefore, that the adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater sexual risk to underage children than does the adult homosexual male."
A. Nicholas Groth, William F. Hobson, and Thomas S. Gary, “The Child Molester: Clinical Observations,” in Social Work and Child Sexual Abuse, eds. Jon R. Conte and David A. Shore (New York: Haworth Press, 1982), p.136.

**************************

"Amongst the heterosexuals, the commonest remarks concerning attractive features of the victims, were that the young boys did not have any body hair and that their bodies were soft and smooth."
Marshal, W.L.; Barbaree, H.E.; Butt, Jennifer. “Sexual offenders against male children: Sexual preferences.”

******************************

“Homosexual males who preferred physically mature partners responded no more to male children than heterosexual males who preferred physically mature partners responded to female children”
Journal of Sex Research -Freund, Kurt; Watson, Robin J.; Rienzo, Douglas. “Heterosexuality, homosexuality, and the erotic age preference.” Journal of Sex Research 26, no. 1 (1989): 107-117

**************************
“..a child’s risk of being molested by his or her relative’s heterosexual partner is 100 times greater than by someone who might be identified as a homosexual."
(Carole Jenny et al., Are Children at Risk for Sexual Abuse by Homosexuals?; 94 Pediatrics 41; July 1994)

**************************

“The adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater risk to the underage child than does the adult homosexual male”
National Institutes of Health – PubMed (Groth and Birnbaum, “Adult Sexual Orientation and Attraction to Underage Persons.”)

**************************


“The belief that homosexuals are particularly attracted to children is completely unsupported by our data.”
National Institutes of Health – PubMed (Groth and Birnbaum, “Adult Sexual Orientation and Attraction to Underage Persons.”)

**************************

"One study noted that 98% of these male perpetrators self-identified as heterosexual."
Journal of the American Medical Association -
Sexual Abuse of Boys Definition, Prevalence, Correlates, Sequelae, and Management William C. Holmes, MD, MSCE; Gail B. Slap, MD, MS JAMA. 1998;280:1855-1862.

**************************

“A gay man is no more likely than a straight man to perpetrate sexual activity with children.”
Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality -(Stevenson, “Public Policy, Homosexuality and the Sexual Coercion of Children.”)


**************************



The Abel and Harlow Child Molestation Prevention Study of over 4000 child molestors in the US also show that 97% of child molestors were religious and over 70% were married with children:
Child Molestation Research & Prevention Institute

**************************

And here is a general article showing how some conservative religious anti-gay groups misrepresent and distort studies like those above to vilify homosexuals.
Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

Last edited by Ceist; 11-09-2011 at 06:16 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2011, 06:07 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,373,171 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllenDullesMJ12 View Post
The "experts" are agenda driven liberals that want to promote the fantasy of homosexuals being somehow more virtuous than heterosexuals.

All you need to do is apply logic. If those men who are willingly turned on by young boy and adult female, then they are simply bisexuals with a pedophilic kink.
Uh no, not according to FBI profilers of sex-offenders. Or do you think are they "agenda driven liberals...blah blah..."??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2011, 06:08 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,373,171 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
It's a fact. Most molesters self identify as heterosexual. You'd have to ask them.
Or strap on a penile plethysmograph to test their responses.

Last edited by Ceist; 11-09-2011 at 06:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2011, 06:12 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,373,171 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oildog View Post
This is BS made up by some gay professor to justify his thoughts/thesis.

If a male has sex with a male its a homosexual relation. If a man has sex with a kid, its rape.
Research on sex offenders has been going on for the past 50 or 60 years- by straight researchers like Kurt Freund and A. Nicholas Groth whose work is used as the basis of FBI profiling of sex-offenders.

But yes I agree that if a man has sex with a child, it is rape.

Last edited by Ceist; 11-09-2011 at 06:23 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2011, 06:18 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,741,672 times
Reputation: 24862
There is no accounting for sexual preference. That is why we need laws to protect childern. This guy had apparently achieved Godhood in his profession. That led to his certainty that he was not hurting anyone and was above the law anyway. He apparently believed nobody would tell on the coach. WRONG.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2011, 06:18 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
17,029 posts, read 30,904,799 times
Reputation: 16265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
Research on sex offenders has been going on for the past 40 years or so- by straight researchers like Kurt Freund and A. Nicholas Groth whose work is used as the basis of FBI profiling of sex-offenders.

But yes I agree that if a man has sex with a child, it is rape.
Yes. Attraction to someone, is completely different than having power over someone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top