Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-12-2011, 08:10 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,959,384 times
Reputation: 3070

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Yet our Congress passed the laws which have allowed much if not most what they have done to be legal. Furthermore, at least three POTUSs in a row have used the US troops to further the agenda of the big banks and big oil by waging war overseas without Congressional consent (in the name of NATO or the UN).
Spot On!

Thing is, this is all being engineered away from the prying eyes of the public, but it is not hard to see how Washington works when your lucky to catch a glimpse.


During 1994 when Brooksley Born tried to regulate OTC Derivatives, 13 Banksters piled into Summers Office and basically told them who is boss:

Quote:
“I walk into Brooksley’s office one day; the blood has drained from her face,” says Michael Greenberger, a former top official at the CFTC who worked closely with Born. “She’s hanging up the telephone; she says to me: ‘That was [former Assistant Treasury Secretary] Larry Summers. He says, “You’re going to cause the worst financial crisis since the end of World War II.”… [He says he has] 13 bankers in his office who informed him of this. Stop, right away. No more.’” Greenspan, Rubin and Summers ultimately prevailed on Congress to stop Born and limit future regulation of derivatives…


This tells me that it has been the Banksters calling the shots from day one.
They knew what they were playing with and is why they put a stop in 1994 from any regulation being forth that would hurt their long term plans.

I have yet to find an uproar about the Community Reinvestment Act from these banksters, and more than likely, were there when CRA was signed, smiling as it were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-12-2011, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,935,420 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by pommysmommy View Post
I think it will be a cold day in Hell before any American takes marching orders from an anti-american foreigner.
Sadly there are useful idiots that will....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Back and Forth FRANCE
2,713 posts, read 3,023,523 times
Reputation: 1483
Not surprising. It's obvious these thugs have WANTED to get violent for quite some time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Louisiana
9,138 posts, read 5,802,841 times
Reputation: 7706
A year and a half old story describing such atrocities as a fax of a noose.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
And what about when they bashed that womans head in, stomping her into the ground?
Gee, that story gets worse every time it's told.
"bashed that womans head in?" Really?
The woman rushed the candidate's car and was justly wrestled to the
ground. She provoked the incident and Paul's people overreacted.
Tim Profitt was way out of line for stepping on her head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 09:01 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,930,375 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
Spot On!

Thing is, this is all being engineered away from the prying eyes of the public, but it is not hard to see how Washington works when your lucky to catch a glimpse.


During 1994 when Brooksley Born tried to regulate OTC Derivatives, 13 Banksters piled into Summers Office and basically told them who is boss:

Would love to read that link if you have it.



This tells me that it has been the Banksters calling the shots from day one.
They knew what they were playing with and is why they put a stop in 1994 from any regulation being forth that would hurt their long term plans.

I have yet to find an uproar about the Community Reinvestment Act from these banksters, and more than likely, were there when CRA was signed, smiling as it were.
We had a thread awhile back. But of course, anyone who voiced an opinion against the CRA is quickly labeled a "racist".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 09:50 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,959,384 times
Reputation: 3070
Here is the link


Watch The Full Program Online | The Warning | FRONTLINE | PBS

Quote:
In The Warning, veteran FRONTLINE producer Michael Kirk unearths the hidden history of the nation's worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. At the center of it all he finds Brooksley Born, who speaks for the first time on television about her failed campaign to regulate the secretive, multitrillion-dollar derivatives market whose crash helped trigger the financial collapse in the fall of 2008.

"I didn't know Brooksley Born," says former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt, a member of President Clinton's powerful Working Group on Financial Markets. "I was told that she was irascible, difficult, stubborn, unreasonable." Levitt explains how the other principals of the Working Group -- former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin -- convinced him that Born's attempt to regulate the risky derivatives market could lead to financial turmoil, a conclusion he now believes was "clearly a mistake."

Born's battle behind closed doors was epic, Kirk finds. The members of the President's Working Group vehemently opposed regulation -- especially when proposed by a Washington outsider like Born.

"I walk into Brooksley's office one day; the blood has drained from her face," says Michael Greenberger, a former top official at the CFTC who worked closely with Born. "She's hanging up the telephone; she says to me: 'That was [former Assistant Treasury Secretary] Larry Summers. He says, "You're going to cause the worst financial crisis since the end of World War II."... [He says he has] 13 bankers in his office who informed him of this. Stop, right away. No more.'"

Greenspan, Rubin and Summers ultimately prevailed on Congress to stop Born and limit future regulation of derivatives. "Born faced a formidable struggle pushing for regulation at a time when the stock market was booming," Kirk says. "Alan Greenspan was the maestro, and both parties in Washington were united in a belief that the markets would take care of themselves."

Now, with many of the same men who shut down Born in key positions in the Obama administration, The Warning reveals the complicated politics that led to this crisis and what it may say about current attempts to prevent the next one.

"It'll happen again if we don't take the appropriate steps," Born warns. "There will be significant financial downturns and disasters attributed to this regulatory gap over and over until we learn from experience."

and you can watch it online here:


Video: The Warning | Watch FRONTLINE Online | PBS Video

Last edited by J746NEW; 11-12-2011 at 10:03 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2011, 07:37 AM
 
Location: So Cal
10,030 posts, read 9,505,733 times
Reputation: 10452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Hows that different from TEA party protestors going to rallies with guns strapped across their back?

Shield vs. Gun, you tell me whats worse? Were you outraged when folks exercised their second amendment rights? You sure seem outraged about people exercising their first amendment rights, when they disagree with you.
Big difference. The OWS now has a history of violence, criminal activity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2011, 07:40 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,024 posts, read 14,201,797 times
Reputation: 16747
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
Perhaps the cops shouldn't trample on the first amendment either.
"Peaceable assembly" does not extend to TRESPASS on other people's property or their rights.
"Peaceable assembly" that does, ceases to have immunity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2011, 11:27 AM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,493,154 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
"Peaceable assembly" does not extend to TRESPASS on other people's property or their rights.
"Peaceable assembly" that does, ceases to have immunity.
Public property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2011, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,024 posts, read 14,201,797 times
Reputation: 16747
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
Public property.
When "occupiers" prevent the use by others, it's a TRESPASS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top