Occupy Protesters Pepper Sprayed in the Face by Police (weapon, regime, suspect)

[HappyTexan]

Originally Posted by MiamiRob

faux propoganda! Imagine if they would have pepper sprayed the Tea Party protestors instead but you can't do that to a bunch of old white Conservatives can you?

PS: What do Jews have to do with this?

The Tea Party protesters gave the police no reason to pepper spray them so you present a false argument because the Tea Party protests did occur and were nothing like the OWS protests.

[cmforte]

Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal

Again your posts show no grasp of reality. Not a personal attack, just an obeservation:

1. subtitles are racist
2. smaller packages = food discrimination
3. Obama is the best POTUS ever
4. Unlawful trespass resulting in LEO actions of compliance are a violation of the Constituion

Meghan McCain, is that you?

Don't forget that jujulu wants a one-world government, too.

[outbacknv]

Originally Posted by jujulu

This is criminal, an abridgement of our 1st amendment rights. These jackbooted thugs need to lose their badges for this.

This is utterly laughable. The First Amendment does not guarantee a right to inhibit commerce and impair freedom of movement on public roadways.

Your lack of understanding would be amusing were it not so pathetic.

[burdell]

Originally Posted by Rick Roma

Apparently this is a difficult concept for some people to understand:

Obey the law and the police will not pepper spray you

Difficult concept?

Like the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' that so many of the self-Righteous are incapable of understanding?

After all, even Saddam wasn't punished until after the trial

[HappyTexan]

Originally Posted by burdell

Difficult concept?

Like the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' that so many of the self-Righteous are incapable of understanding?

After all, even Saddam wasn't punished until after the trial

Incidents like this did not happen with Tea Party protests yet they are a daily occurrence with OWS.

Even protesters need to protest within the bounds of the law.

[lifelongMOgal]

Originally Posted by burdell

Difficult concept?

Like the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' that so many of the self-Righteous are incapable of understanding?

After all, even Saddam wasn't punished until after the trial

What part of "compliance" is unclear? Really, I'm concerned that you figure this out before encountering one of these tools.

[burdell]

Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal

What part of "compliance" is unclear? Really, I'm concerned that you figure this out before encountering one of these tools.

And I'm concerned that too many who worship at the altar of St Ronnie still believe in his idea of a bloodbath being the way to end protest.

What next?

Shoot American citizens for walking on the wrong side of the street?

[outbacknv]

Originally Posted by burdell

Difficult concept?

Like the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' that so many of the self-Righteous are incapable of understanding?

After all, even Saddam wasn't punished until after the trial

The courts are there for the purpose of determining innocence or guilt. They are the proper venue for making the argument of innocence.

Choosing to make that same argument on the street is all but begging to personally experience the escalation of force.

[burdell]

Originally Posted by HappyTexan

Incidents like this did not happen with Tea Party protests yet they are a daily occurrence with OWS.

Even protesters need to protest within the bounds of the law.

And spraying people in the face with chemicals for sitting down accomplishes exactly WHAT? I suppose if one dared throw a pebble you'd advocate firing into the crowd with automatic weapons?

[HappyTexan]

Originally Posted by burdell

And I'm concerned that too many who worship at the altar of St Ronnie still believe in his idea of a bloodbath being the way to end protest.

What next?

Shoot American citizens for walking on the wrong side of the street?

The only "blood" has been spilled by the protesters themselves.

Obstruction of justice is a crime or do you think OWS is above the law ?