Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-26-2011, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,461,656 times
Reputation: 4586

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
I am against it, but then, their lifestyle is destructive; disease and inability to reproduce as nature intended dooms them to extinction.


How are they "doomed to extinction"?

Do you think that only gays can have gay children? If so, how were they born? Particularly before the days of in vitro fertilization, etc.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2011, 01:51 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,222,978 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post


How are they "doomed to extinction"?

Do you think that only gays can have gay children? If so, how were they born? Particularly before the days of in vitro fertilization, etc.?
There are always aberrations of nature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2011, 01:51 PM
 
30,897 posts, read 36,958,653 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA View Post
I see it as progress. It is definitely a civil rights issue and, hey, what's wrong with being in a committed relationship, legally.

I can certainly understand why religious folks would be against it which is why I would never advocate forcing a religious entity to perform a marriage ceremony. But I do not believe that same-sex couples should be denied a civil/state marriage. Working on a religious marriage is something they need to deal with on a personal level.
^^This^^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2011, 01:53 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,774,139 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
I am against it, but then, their lifestyle is destructive; disease and inability to reproduce as nature intended dooms them to extinction.
There is so much stupid in this post I don't know where to begin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2011, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,461,656 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
There are always aberrations of nature.
Let me just pretend that they are "aberrations of nature" for a second. Why would these "aberrations of nature" simply stop in the future?

Last edited by afoigrokerkok; 11-26-2011 at 02:08 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2011, 01:54 PM
 
30,897 posts, read 36,958,653 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swingblade View Post
It does not matter what I think. But the federal gvt has no constitutional role to define marriage,legalize gay marriage, or abolish. This is a state issue and I support the states that have accepted gay marriage and those that have not. Of course gays have the right to due process { the proper phrase eludes me} to present a case to the SC. That is where the whole issue is heading and will be and decided.

I agree the Constitution doesn't talk about marriage. The problem is that much of marriage law has been federalized (such as Social Security benefits, tax law, etc). I'm totally against this, but to have true marriage equality, it has to happen at the federal level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2011, 01:55 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,222,978 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
There is so much stupid in this post I don't know where to begin.
Try.

In my house, all gay channels are blocked since I don't want my daughter exposed to some simpering, over feminized jackass mincing around on camera.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2011, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,461,656 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
all gay channels are blocked
What channels are these?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2011, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
In my house, all gay channels are blocked since I don't want my daughter exposed to some simpering, over feminized jackass mincing around on camera.
Gay channels? Oh my.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2011, 01:58 PM
 
30,897 posts, read 36,958,653 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lahaina Lopaka View Post
According to thousands of generations of people, east and west, north and south, across all the continent,s who have always considered and defined marriage, by whatever term or conditions they apply to the institution, as being between two people of different sexes, i.e. 1 ea man and and 1 ea woman. In a very few cases, it has been 1ea man and multiple ea women.

That's who.
The "that's the way we've always done it" argument isn't very convincing for me. For centuries, married women used to be considered property of their husbands, too. Just because something is a tradition, doesn't mean it's good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top