If the blinds were open, was it a crime to look? (government, state)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Would the people walking down the street be charged too if they happen to look in the direction of that open window? What is happening with this country? We are becoming a complete police state where you can get arrested for looking out your window? Maybe her parents should be arrested for letting her change with the windows open?
Would the people walking down the street be charged too if they happen to look in the direction of that open window? What is happening with this country? We are becoming a complete police state where you can get arrested for looking out your window? Maybe her parents should be arrested for letting her change with the windows open?
No No No No, we don't take personal responsibility for our own actions here in America, parents don't take responsibility for their children's actions here in American, where have you been?
Even if this guy had been flogging his dolphin, so long as you couldn't see him doing that from outside his window, is perfectly legal unless you live in a police state! What is wrong with this country?
Oops, my mistake! I must have been slightly distracted when I read the "without" and read it as "with". My apologies to those I "all caps" screamed. Was doing housework while reading and responding. So sorry. No, he shouldn't have been arrested.
The real problem here are ADAs and DAs. A DA position now has become a stepping stone to a career in politics, which attracts people with presonality disorders who will do anything to get what they want. This is a reflection on our society, and the saddest part is that we keep on electing mentally ill people to political office, so we reward their behavior. These DA's are trying to make names for themselves at the expense of people's simple right to look out the window.
If he had merely witnesses simply by looking out his window, no. But the fact that he was using optical devices and video recording equipment,...HELL YES! Walk him into court naked as start of his punishment!
"Weinblatt was being charged for surveilling that took place from his own home, without the aid of a telescope, binoculars, or a still or video camera."
Here's a hypothetical. Say if the neighbor had a giant TV and was watching child porn, and the neighbor looked out his window and saw it. Didn't report it, and another neighbor calls the cops on both. Is the person who saw it from his window guilty of any crime? Surely the one with the child porn on the TV would be.. But the guy looking out the window?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
