Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
One can't brush off evidence by saying "no it didn't." This isn't third grade.
The link to my previous thread specifically is about GDP. We should also note that you still haven't provided ANY evidence supporting your statement. Did I say ANY?
Then why are you brushing the evidence off that says unemployment did go up under obama.
And yes I did.. I linked right to the CBO reports.. Maybe its your inability to read anything that proves your hero's policies are a failure that makes it difficult for you to actually comprehend whats provided.
I see the Democrats in this thread use facts and evidence to prove that "that liar" didn't lie. I see the Reps in this thread believe that Ms. Shultz lied because it is comforting to their predisposed viewpoint and the claim validates what they already decided -- apart from facts.
But as John Adams said, “Facts are stubborn things; and what ever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they can not alter the state of facts, and evidence.”
It's the predictable and amusing denial of the desperate we witness. They do amuse, don't they?
DWS is a character right out of a horror story recounting the communist takeover in eastern europe. She is frighteneing because her words defy logic and she actually pretends to rabidly believe what she says.
As far as unemployment not rising under Obama, I know nothing except no one from the Obama camp has ever argued that position. Every financial guru and program has been consistent in their agreement that the UErate is interpretive at best and the rate of unemployment is higher than the standard rate issued.
Obama regime has set precedent in presenting economic results that are nothing but stastical projections or employs never before used reference points to showcase thier claims. Smoke and mirrors would best describe Obama's view of the US and global economy.
DWS is just a fearful nightmare in the form of a woman whose threatening rhwetoric represents the new social and political ideology that uses intimidation and lies to gain power.
The only way unemployment numbers can go down under 0bama, is when Americans just give up looking for a job, and simply leave the US work force. How else can we have anemic job numbers like last month, and see the UE percentage drop by almost 5%?
The facts are clear. Unemployment rises were on a 45 degree upward slop from from all of 2008 and ending in April 2009. Only a moron would think that simply having a new resident in the WH would change the slop. Then, the slope diminished and then reversed.
I need to remind the Republicans here that Saint Reagan experienced a worse case.
Reagan's unemployment kept rising until it peaked at near 11%. Then, it dropped at a similar time in his administration to Obama's. So, if you are going to blame Obama for a long period of unemployment, you need to do the same thing to Reagan.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They do amuse, don't they?
