Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:02 PM
 
2,125 posts, read 1,939,523 times
Reputation: 1010

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
Yes, scientists lean heavily liberal and that's because they're in favor of big government that funds their projects.
Yeah man, f the government, all funding scientific advancement and what not. It's not like they might have other reasons for being liberal beyond economic support, namely the positions of the right towards science and access to education.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:03 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,809,014 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
Yes, scientists lean heavily liberal and that's because they're in favor of big government that funds their projects.
Most that are heavily educated are also strongly liberal. Those that want big government to fund their projects are the heavily right winger like the big banks, oil, and other large corporations. They don't care about anything but numbers, dollar bills to line their pockets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:11 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,860,561 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
Most that are heavily educated are also strongly liberal. Those that want big government to fund their projects are the heavily right winger like the big banks, oil, and other large corporations. They don't care about anything but numbers, dollar bills to line their pockets.
Lame. This may be news to you, but we don't all own oil companies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:15 PM
 
679 posts, read 660,732 times
Reputation: 492
People who lean left tend to be more concerned with facts and what's best for the populace.

Right wing people run on individual fallacies and religious dogmatic emotion.

The hypocrisy here is amazing...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:21 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,382,997 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stateisota View Post
People who lean left tend to be more concerned with facts and what's best for the populace.

Right wing people run on individual fallacies and religious dogmatic emotion.

The hypocrisy here is amazing...
People who lean left and lean right are usually very unaware of facts that aren't presented them on the nightly news. As such, they are generally woefully inequipped in the battle against government waste. Both parties are guilty of continuing that trend.

Americans are mad now, but we don't know about what. Conservatives blame liberal spending as the economic problem. Liberals blame Conservatives for not raising taxes on the rich. Neither side is willing to cut what has to be cut, or to raise taxes which have to be raised to save the programs that Americans demand to be saved.

As such, barring a major war or technological breakthrough in energy, we'll continue the status quo until one of the two previous things mentioned happens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:25 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,809,014 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
Lame. This may be news to you, but we don't all own oil companies.
That's true, the big oil companies own most of the GOP politicians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:27 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,860,561 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
That's true, the big oil companies own most of the GOP politicians.
Yeah the Democratic party is free of corruption. But we're not talking about politicians are we? No. We're talking about belief systems. That's why your regurgitated argument is practically worthless here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,356,787 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
That's true, the big oil companies own most of the GOP politicians.
Plenty of petro-pork deals among Democrats. Remember the Al Gore-Occidental Petroleum connection? Remember Rahm Emanuel's rent-free luxury DC condo, owned by a top BP marketing consultant?
The ties that bind. Remember Rahm Emanuel's rent-free D.C. apartment? The owner: A BP adviser - latimes.com

Remember the reports of massive donations by BP to Obama 2008? Don't kid yourself, kid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,729,686 times
Reputation: 35920
This liberal is good with numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:56 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,288,050 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
This is going to sound like a troll, but I'm seriously interested in seeing feedback. It always has been a pet theory of mine that liberals tend to be good with words, but bad with numbers. Liberals are great writers and communicators. Hollywood obviously is dominated by liberals, as is media and the legal profession.

However, in the thread about congressional 'approval ratings,' I tried to explain the faulty premise behind this number. Notice, I said, that incumbency relection rates are in the neighborhood of 90 percent. There's your rating. Conservative posters seemed to get it; liberals didn't.

Economics and finance traditionally has been a conservative realm. Maybe that is changing somewhat with a Paul Krugman getting the econ Nobel Prize. I think that is somewhat just a market phenomenon more than an intellectual one. There is a great demand for liberal economists from liberal politicians, and what is in demand, is produced by the market.

I also suspect that liberals at the top tend NOT to be bad with numbers. I remember seeing video of Bill Clinton in a meeting talking about poll data, and clearly he is a numbers maven, at least when it comes to political polling. But as far as the unwashed masses of liberallism, the 'useful followers,' so to speak, I'm convinced that many of them are not just not good with numbers.
You, a troll? Why would anyone ever think that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top