Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
On Feb. 27, 2009 this article was printed in the Washington Post as Charles Krauthammer began a series of columns about what Obama intended to do for or to us, depending on how you look at it. It is an interesting beginning of what the good doctor saw as what was coming right after the State of the Union speech.
That shows me where your brain resides concerning politics. How about you provide one or two examples of what you say about him? Maybe you could read the link and then prove some of what he said to be wrong.
You have to know that your reply was that of what you called the good Doctor. You did know that he is both an MD and a lawyer with a degree from the same college that our President got his from, don't you?
Krautheimer is an angry bitter man. And not all that in terms of political insight. He preaches to an angry bitter choir.
What did he preach in this link that hasn't come to be? I thought that surely someone would have read it and replied about it by now, but it seems that only non-reading haters are going to take part.
What did he preach in this link that hasn't come to be? I thought that surely someone would have read it and replied about it by now, but it seems that only non-reading haters are going to take part.
Maybe you can explain to us why Charlie's three year old opinion piece is at all relevant except for his Obama-bashing that you choir boys thrive on.
Maybe you can explain to us why Charlie's three year old opinion piece is at all relevant except for his Obama-bashing that you choir boys thrive on.
This is my last reply to you since you point out not one thing that hasn't come to be from the link. Read it and let me know what part is so wrong and hasn't come to be or is very near to that.
Also, let me give you another in the series of 5 columns he wrote back than so you can take a bit more time to read about what Charlie was writing about that first SOTU.
Anyone who views Mao and Obama as similar public figures is an idiot.
I failed to see the name Mao in the link that started this thread but then I read it to see what it said so I could talk to people who read it and came back with some proof about what the man said. Can you list some of the things you found to be untrue today?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
angry bitter choir...
