Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:32 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Review what an Economic Stimulus is please.
Calling poop cake, doesnt mean the cake isnt poop
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:34 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcus_phoenix View Post
Can you imagine if Bush was never voted into power? How different things would be? We would never be in the mess which Obama is busy cleaning up.
Yeah, cause we all know the Democrats would have wanted to reform the mortgage industry like Bush wanted to, but they just opposed it because they wanted to see america fail, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:35 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcus_phoenix View Post
Can you imagine if Bush was never voted into power? How different things would be? We would never be in the mess which Obama is busy cleaning up.
Please explain how you come up with this theory?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:36 AM
 
Location: NC
6,032 posts, read 9,210,341 times
Reputation: 6378
Here's the problem with this report -- the non-institutional working-age population went from 240.441 million to 240.584, a gain of 143,000 people of working age. But the number of employed people went down from 141.070 million to 140.681 -- a loss of 389,000. Adding the two, which is the correct way to look at it, the economy on a population-adjusted basis lost 532,000 jobs.


Courtesy of the Market Ticker Blog


Ok, so the actual number of employed people went down.










Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:38 AM
 
Location: NC
6,032 posts, read 9,210,341 times
Reputation: 6378
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Review what an Economic Stimulus is please.
Buzz word for printing money

Buzz word for new government program to dump money down a black hole usually resulting in benefit to some Corporation who donated money or is a friend of elected official

Buzz word for cutting taxes (payroll) that we can't afford cuts in
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Northern MN
3,869 posts, read 15,169,496 times
Reputation: 3614
Unemployment should be going back up as the X-Mass help gets laid off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Are you of the opinion that these numbers won't be "adjusted downward" "unexpectedly?"
Keep your fingers crossed, - it could happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:40 AM
 
Location: NC
6,032 posts, read 9,210,341 times
Reputation: 6378
Anyone going to comment refuting anything I have posted guys?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suncc49 View Post
Here's the problem with this report -- the non-institutional working-age population went from 240.441 million to 240.584, a gain of 143,000 people of working age. But the number of employed people went down from 141.070 million to 140.681 -- a loss of 389,000. Adding the two, which is the correct way to look at it, the economy on a population-adjusted basis lost 532,000 jobs.


Courtesy of the Market Ticker Blog


Ok, so the actual number of employed people went down.

















Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:41 AM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,565,019 times
Reputation: 6324
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Economies go up and down, but if Obama is responsible for this "recovery" want to explain to me why the recovery is starting AFTER the stimulus bill is over?

This is EXACTLY what I said would happen here YEARS AGO..
Because the stimulus was needed in order for a recovery to even be able to happen in the first place.

I've been saying this was a two-term process all along, even before Obama was elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:41 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by snofarmer View Post
Unemployment should be going back up as the X-Mass help gets laid off.
And Democrats will be here blaming the GOP like clockwork.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top