Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
yes thanks Orly for showing the nation just how incompetent of a lawyer you are. you are the number one source of making the Republican party look very stupid.
Only guarantees with every claim that comes out of her mouth, that Obama will be re-elected, and in another landslide.
dean haskins, organizer of 'the birther summit", would beg to differ. he sees orly's antics as detrimental to the birthers:
" I then saw articles stating, in no uncertain terms, that Barack Obama had been ordered by a judge to "stand trial" in Georgia, and that Orly Taitz was finally granted "discovery." Out of intense curiosity, I began looking seriously into these claims (something, I fear, many of us have been remiss at doing).
Here is what I discovered about those fantastic claims: none of them were actually true—at least, not in a legal sense."
OF SUBPOENAS, TRIALS, AND A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT (http://www.birthersummit.org/news/74-of-subpoenas-trials-and-a-vexatious-litigant.html - broken link)
yes thanks Orly for showing the nation just how incompetent of a lawyer you are. you are the number one source of making the Republican party look very stupid.
Only guarantees with every claim that comes out of her mouth, that Obama will be re-elected, and in another landslide.
The Republican party is not a part of this proceeding. They played no role.
I'm beginning to think you're more concerned with defending Obama than determining the truth.
nope, just following the law. if the uncle was not present at birth what testimony could he give that wouldn't be hearsay? i imagine if he had an announcement card that said "it's a boy!...... from: someplace not the US" he could submit that and testify about receiving/maintaining it. outside of that improbability..... not much to offer the court.
nope, just following the law. if the uncle was not present at birth what testimony could he give that wouldn't be hearsay? i imagine if he had an announcement card that said "it's a boy!...... from: someplace not the US" he could submit that and testify about receiving/maintaining it. outside of that improbability..... not much to offer the court.
The illegal alien uncle can testify the defendants father was not a US citizen.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
