Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-26-2012, 04:32 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,077,572 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by fy10fyr View Post
Absolutely it is. The birther movement is racist at it's core.

Steve McGarret is the one who threw out the "his mom did interracial porn" comment.

When you've got nothing, that's what you do. Lies and "yo mamma".

I said it before, it would be funny if wasn't so pathetic.
You know... I really do not believe that all Birthers are racist. But when you are putting on white sheets and headed to the cross-burning, you really can't pretend its just for the roasted marshmallows.

 
Old 01-26-2012, 04:37 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
i just want to point out, since we posted different zip codes, that there are multiple zip codes for honolulu. most correspond to danbury with the one digit change but even the few that don't still correspond to a CT location.


That is a zipcode, not the identifiers for the office that issued it.

With my birth certificate from Oklahoma, my mother and father were able to get my SS registration in Texas, on the spot, card in hand as we left, 6 years after my birth. I needed it to work for the Austin American Statesman, throwing newspapers.

I have a Texas identifier.

SS cards are not issued by mail.
 
Old 01-26-2012, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,944,793 times
Reputation: 7118
So what happened? Was a default judgement entered for the plaintiffs?
 
Old 01-26-2012, 04:40 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,271,551 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
There is no truth to the rumor that Break-dancing was invented by Arus while twisting, spinning, shucking, jiving, excuse-making, and generally trying to duck the truth as he is doing here.
Please provide the court documents that show that Lolo Soetoro adopted Barack obama. this has to be from Indonesia courts as his adoption would have not been recognized there if done in the US.

Please also provide the US court documents to show the adoption

Please provide the court documents to show that Barack obama II legally changed his name. Name changes are required by law to also be published in a publication that is readily ciruclated. Please provide the Honolulu Newspaper classified sections that show that Barack H. Obama II legally changed his name to Barry Soetoro.


while you're at it, I'll post the Indonesia law from 1958 that would have prevented Lolo Soetoro from adoption Barack and was in effect at the time Barack and Stanley arrived in Indonesia, thereby that woudln't have made him a citizen of Indonesia:

UNHCR | Refworld | Law No. 62 of 1958, Law on the Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia
Quote:
"Article 2.

(1)A foreign child of less than 5 years age who is adopted by a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia acquires the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, if such an adoption is declared legal by the Pengadilan Negeri at the residence of the person adopting the child."
Barack Obama II arrived in Indonesia when he was 6 years of age. By law, he couldn't have been adopted and HE certainly could not have attained Indonesian citizenship. He was simply too old.

No tap dancing on my part. Its you birthers who didn't bother to research the laws and have to move goal posts in order to make yoru conspiracy fit your addled brained thought up fiction.



Keep your sympathies to yourself and your fellow birthers. Especially the ones that have admitted to breaking the law.
 
Old 01-26-2012, 04:41 PM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,496,025 times
Reputation: 1406
It will all come to nothing. Whatever ruling the Georgia court makes will not be upheld for the simple reason that the court lacks jurisdiction. And, as far as the November election is concerned, the Secretary of State for Georgia can and, if necessary, will be compelled to put President Obama’s name on the ballot by the Democratic Party of Georgia in an action for administrative mandamus.
 
Old 01-26-2012, 04:44 PM
 
26,569 posts, read 14,444,771 times
Reputation: 7431
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
That is a zipcode, not the identifiers for the office that issued it.

With my birth certificate from Oklahoma, my mother and father were able to get my SS registration in Texas, on the spot, card in hand as we left, 6 years after my birth. I needed it to work for the Austin American Statesman, throwing newspapers.

I have a Texas identifier.

SS cards are not issued by mail.
then yours was issued pre-1973. after that there were issued from the central location in baltimore .
 
Old 01-26-2012, 04:45 PM
 
426 posts, read 958,490 times
Reputation: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wendell Phillips View Post
And, as far as the November election is concerned, the Secretary of State for Georgia can and, if necessary, will be compelled to put President Obama’s name on the ballot by the Democratic Party of Georgia in an action for administrative mandamus.

This.

Do the birthers really think that the DNC will allow their nominee to be kept off the ballot?

If so, they are even more deluded than I thought, and that's saying something.
 
Old 01-26-2012, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,077,572 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
So what happened? Was a default judgement entered for the plaintiffs?
No. One was not.
 
Old 01-26-2012, 04:48 PM
 
26,569 posts, read 14,444,771 times
Reputation: 7431
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
So what happened? Was a default judgement entered for the plaintiffs?
nope. all parties have till feb 5 to submit for consideration.
 
Old 01-26-2012, 04:49 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,271,551 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
That is a zipcode, not the identifiers for the office that issued it.
not needed. the SSA says that geocode doesn't matter.


http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html

Quote:
The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.

Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving westward. So people on the east coast have the lowest numbers and those on the west coast have the highest numbers.

Note: One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.

Last edited by Arus; 01-26-2012 at 04:54 PM.. Reason: Giving the official source explanation instead
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top